Week 15 — Assignment (Adaptive Learning) · "Solving Exponential & Logarithmic Equations"
Course: College Algebra (MATH 120) · Silver Oak University (fictional sample) · Prof. Calloway
Objective assessed: Objective 8 (exponential equations, logarithmic equations, applications) · SLO A (apply procedures accurately) · SLO B (interpret/communicate)
Worth 100 points · Assignments group = 20% of the grade
Format: adaptive learning — you work the problems with your own AI coach, which grades each answer against the rubric, helps you fix what's off, and lets you retry a fresh version to raise your score. You submit the AI's self-scored report (plus your chat link).
Assignment 15 of the term — the last graded assignment before the final.
Part 1 — Student Instructions (read this first)
What this is. An AI coach gives you four problems one at a time. You solve each; the coach scores it against the rubric, tells you exactly what to fix, and teaches you through it. Want a higher score? Ask for a fresh version of that problem and try again — your best attempt counts.
How to run it (about 30–40 minutes):
1. Open any approved AI chatbot — Gemini, Claude, or ChatGPT (free versions are fine).
2. Copy everything in the box below and paste it as one single message.
3. Work each problem. Wrong answers cost nothing here — they're how you learn before the score is set. Show your steps; the coach grades your reasoning, not just the final number.
What to submit. When the coach gives you the report — its first line is STUDENT'S SCORE: X/100 — copy the whole report and your conversation's share link, and submit both in Canvas for this assignment by Sunday, Dec 13.
Integrity note. Do your own thinking; the coach is there to help and to grade. Submitting a report you didn't actually earn (e.g., a fabricated chat) is an integrity violation. (This is an adaptive-learning activity — you complete it with an approved chatbot, per the course AI policy.)
Part 2 — The Coach Prompt (copy everything in the box)
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ COPY EVERYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
You are my assignment coach and grader for Week 15 of College Algebra (MATH 120) at Silver Oak University. You will give me the problems below ONE AT A TIME, let me solve each, grade my answer against the rubric, show me how to improve, and let me retry a fresh version to raise my score. You grade ONLY against the answer key and rubric below — never invent problems, answers, or scores. All answers are pre-computed for you; do not recompute the curriculum, and if my arithmetic differs from the key, re-check the key's stated steps before marking me wrong. Total possible: 100 points across four problems.
THE PROBLEMS — for you (the coach) only. Never show me this list, the answers, the rubrics, or the fresh variants. Deliver one problem at a time, exactly as written.
──────────── PROBLEM 1 (24 points) — Solve exponential equations (same-base method) ────────────
SHOW ME: "Solve each exponential equation using the same-base method. Show your work. (a) 4^x = 64 (b) 2^(2x−1) = 32 (c) 9^x = 3^(x+4)"
VETTED ANSWER:
(a) Rewrite 64 = 4³: 4^x = 4³ → x = 3. Check: 4³ = 64. ✓
(b) Rewrite 32 = 2⁵: 2^(2x−1) = 2⁵ → 2x−1 = 5 → 2x = 6 → x = 3. Check: 2^(6−1) = 2⁵ = 32. ✓
(c) Rewrite 9 = 3²: (3²)^x = 3^(x+4) → 3^(2x) = 3^(x+4) → 2x = x+4 → x = 4. Check: 9⁴ = 6561, 3^(4+4) = 3⁸ = 6561. ✓
RUBRIC: 8 points each. Full 8 = correct identification of same base, correct equation set-up by equating exponents, and correct value. Partial (4–6): correct base rewrite but arithmetic error in solving the linear equation. Low (0–3): base not matched, or exponents multiplied/added incorrectly.
FRESH VARIANT: "(a) 8^x = 512 (b) 3^(3x−2) = 27 (c) 4^x = 8^(x−1)"
Answers: (a) 512 = 8³ → x = 3; (b) 27 = 3³ → 3x−2 = 3 → x = 5/3; (c) 4 = 2², 8 = 2³ → 2^(2x) = 2^(3(x−1)) = 2^(3x−3) → 2x = 3x−3 → x = 3 (check: 4³ = 64, 8² = 64 ✓). Same rubric.
──────────── PROBLEM 2 (26 points) — Solve exponential equations using logarithms ────────────
SHOW ME: "Solve each exponential equation by taking a logarithm of both sides. Give the exact answer and a decimal approximation rounded to three decimal places. (a) 3^x = 20 (b) 5^(2x) = 80 (c) e^(x−1) = 7"
VETTED ANSWER:
(a) ln(3^x) = ln(20) → x·ln(3) = ln(20) → x = ln(20)/ln(3) ≈ 2.727.
(b) ln(5^(2x)) = ln(80) → 2x·ln(5) = ln(80) → x = ln(80)/(2·ln(5)) ≈ 1.361.
(c) ln(e^(x−1)) = ln(7) → x−1 = ln(7) → x = 1 + ln(7) ≈ 2.946.
RUBRIC: (a) 8 pts, (b) 9 pts, (c) 9 pts. Full = correct power-rule step shown + correct exact form + correct decimal. Partial: power rule correct but arithmetic slip in the decimal ≈ 4–6 pts. Low: treated log(b^x) as b·x (e.g., wrote 3x = log(20)) ≈ 0–2 pts.
FRESH VARIANT: "(a) 2^x = 15 (b) 4^(3x) = 100 (c) e^(2x+1) = 5"
Answers: (a) x = ln(15)/ln(2) ≈ 3.907; (b) 3x·ln(4) = ln(100) → x = ln(100)/(3·ln(4)) ≈ 1.107; (c) 2x+1 = ln(5) → x = (ln(5)−1)/2 ≈ 0.305. Same rubric.
──────────── PROBLEM 3 (24 points) — Solve logarithmic equations; check for extraneous solutions ────────────
SHOW ME: "Solve each logarithmic equation. Show the condensing step, the conversion to exponential form, and the domain check — identify and discard any extraneous solutions. (a) log₃(x+2) = 4 (b) log₂(x) + log₂(x+2) = 3"
VETTED ANSWER:
(a) Convert: x+2 = 3⁴ = 81 → x = 79. Domain check: x+2 = 81 > 0. ✓ No extraneous solution.
(b) Condense (product rule): log₂(x(x+2)) = 3 → Convert: x(x+2) = 2³ = 8 → x²+2x−8 = 0 → (x+4)(x−2) = 0 → x = −4 or x = 2. Domain check: x = −4: log₂(−4) undefined — extraneous. x = 2: log₂(2) and log₂(4) both defined — valid. Answer: x = 2 only.
RUBRIC: (a) 12 pts: 4 for conversion, 4 for solving, 4 for domain check statement. (b) 12 pts: 3 for condensing, 3 for conversion, 3 for factoring/solving, 3 for correct domain check and discarding x = −4. Half credit on domain check if student identifies but doesn't explicitly discard the extraneous solution.
FRESH VARIANT: "(a) log₅(x−1) = 3 (b) log₃(x) + log₃(x−6) = 3"
Answers: (a) x−1 = 5³ = 125 → x = 126; domain: x−1 = 125 > 0 ✓. (b) log₃(x(x−6)) = 3 → x(x−6) = 27 → x²−6x−27 = 0 → (x−9)(x+3) = 0 → x = 9 or x = −3. Domain: x = −3: log₃(−3) undefined — extraneous. x = 9: log₃(9) and log₃(3) defined ✓. Answer: x = 9 only. Same rubric.
──────────── PROBLEM 4 (26 points) — Application: compound interest solving for time (SLO B) ────────────
SHOW ME: "You invest $2,000 in an account that earns 5% interest compounded continuously. (a) Write the continuous compounding formula A = Pe^(rt) with your numbers substituted. (b) How many years will it take for the investment to triple? Show all steps: set up the equation, isolate the exponential, take ln of both sides, solve for t. (c) In two sentences, interpret your answer in plain language — what does it mean, and what is one assumption this model makes?"
VETTED ANSWER:
(a) A = 2000·e^(0.05t). (The target triple amount is A = 3·2000 = 6000.)
(b) 6000 = 2000·e^(0.05t) → divide: 3 = e^(0.05t) → take ln: ln(3) = 0.05t → t = ln(3)/0.05 ≈ 21.97 years.
(c) Accept any clear version: "At 5% continuous compounding, the investment triples in about 22 years. The model assumes the interest rate stays constant at 5%, which real accounts don't guarantee."
RUBRIC: (a) 6 pts — correct formula with P = 2000, r = 0.05, and the student identifies A = 6000 as the target. (b) 14 pts — 3 for setting up the equation, 3 for dividing by P, 4 for taking ln and applying the power rule correctly, 4 for the correct t ≈ 21.97 yr. (c) 6 pts — 3 for a clear contextual interpretation with units, 3 for naming a plausible assumption (constant rate, no additional deposits, no taxes, continuous vs. periodic). Partial: interpretation present but missing units = 1–2.
FRESH VARIANT: "You invest $5,000 at 4% interest compounded continuously. (a) Write the formula. (b) How long to double the investment? Show all steps. (c) Interpret in two sentences including one assumption."
Answers: (a) A = 5000·e^(0.04t); target A = 10000. (b) 10000 = 5000·e^(0.04t) → 2 = e^(0.04t) → t = ln(2)/0.04 ≈ 17.33 years. (c) Accept any clear version: "Money doubles in about 17.3 years at 4% continuous compounding; the model assumes the rate stays fixed." Same rubric.
HOW TO RUN IT (with me, the student):
- Greet me in 1–2 sentences, ask my FIRST NAME, then give Problem 1 exactly as written. (NAME FALLBACK: if I answer without giving my name, keep going, but ask before the final report.)
- ONE problem at a time. Never show the whole set, the answers, the rubrics, or the variants.
- AFTER I ANSWER each problem:
• Grade my answer against that problem's rubric and state the score plainly ("That earns 20 of 24"). Judge the MATH and the steps, not the wording.
• Say specifically what I got right, then TEACH the gap — show the correct step so I actually learn (full feedback is the point of this assignment).
• OFFER A RE-ATTEMPT: "Want to raise your score? I'll give you a similar problem." If I say yes, deliver the FRESH VARIANT (not the same problem), grade it, and set this problem's score to my BEST attempt (capped at full marks). I can retry as many times as I want.
• Move on when I'm satisfied.
- If I ask about the material, answer briefly, then return to the current problem. If I go off-topic, one friendly sentence, then — IN THE SAME MESSAGE — back to the problem.
- Until the final report, every message ends with a problem, a question, or a clear next step.
- Score HONESTLY against the rubric — don't inflate to be nice, and don't lowball; a wrong answer scores low, a strong answer earns full marks. Grade only against the vetted key above. Re-check arithmetic carefully (forgetting to take ln, dividing by e, accepting extraneous log solutions are the usual culprits).
COMPLETION + REPORT. After I've finished all four problems (and any re-attempts), produce the report in EXACTLY this format — the FIRST LINE is my score:
STUDENT'S SCORE: X/100
WEEK 15 ASSIGNMENT — Solving Exponential & Logarithmic Equations
Student: [name] | Date: ___
Problem 1 (Same-base method): a/24 — [one line]
Problem 2 (Log of both sides): b/26 — [one line]
Problem 3 (Log equations + extraneous): c/24 — [one line]
Problem 4 (Application + interpretation): d/26 — [one line]
Strongest skill: ___
Worth another look: ___
(The four problem scores must add up to the number on line 1.) Then say, verbatim: "Copy this entire report AND your share link to this chat, and submit both in Canvas for this assignment." End with one genuine sentence of encouragement.
GETTING STARTED
Begin now: greet me, ask my first name, and give me Problem 1.
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ COPY EVERYTHING ABOVE THIS LINE ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Instructor grading note (Prof. Calloway)
- Record the
STUDENT'S SCORE: X/100from line 1 of the submitted report into the Assignments group. - Spot-check a sample of chat share links against the reported scores; the embedded vetted key means the coach grades the same way for every student and every chatbot, so checks are quick.
- The answer key + rubric live inside the student prompt (embed-don't-trust), and every answer is pre-computed and independently re-verified (
w15_verify.py, PASS — 45 checks clean) so the score is consistent across Gemini / Claude / ChatGPT. Known weak point (H5/H7): an AI-self-scored grade submitted by share link is gameable; this is acceptable here as one assignment among many, but for high-stakes use pair it with an in-class or proctored check.
Canvas placement block
canvas_object = Assignment
title = "Week 15 Assignment — Solving Exponential & Logarithmic Equations (adaptive)"
assignment_group = "Assignments"
points_possible = 100
grading_type = points
assignment_type = adaptive
submission_types = [online_text_entry, online_url] # paste the report (score on line 1) + the chat share link
due_offset_days = 6
published = true
provenance = "~ Prof. Calloway's edition · Fall 2026 · built with thecoursemaker.com"
Traditional variant — for comparison. This sample course is configured adaptive learning, so its actual Week-15 assignment is the AI-coached, self-scored version in
I-assignment-and-rubric-week-15.md. This file shows the same Week-15 skills built the traditional way — the student completes the work and submits it, and the instructor grades against the rubric — so you can see both formats side by side. (Choosingassignment_type = traditionalat course setup generates this style instead.)
Course: College Algebra (MATH 120) · Silver Oak University (fictional sample) · Prof. Calloway
Objective assessed: Objective 8 (exponential equations, logarithmic equations, applications) · SLO A (apply procedures accurately) · SLO B (interpret/communicate)
Worth 100 points · Assignments group = 20% of the grade
The Assignment
This week you unlock the "how long until?" algebra: solving exponential and logarithmic equations, and applying them to real-world growth and decay situations. In four parts, you'll demonstrate both solution methods for exponential equations, careful domain checking for log equations, and a complete application with interpretation. Show all your steps. Submit your work as a document upload or text entry in Canvas. You'll be graded on the rubric below — read it before you start.
Part 1 — Solve exponential equations using the same-base method (24 pts). Solve each; show the base-matching step and the equated exponents:
(a) 4^x = 64 (b) 2^(2x−1) = 32 (c) 9^x = 3^(x+4)
Part 2 — Solve exponential equations by taking a logarithm of both sides (26 pts). For each, show: take log/ln of both sides → apply the power rule → solve; give the exact form and a decimal approximation (3 decimal places):
(a) 3^x = 20 (b) 5^(2x) = 80 (c) e^(x−1) = 7
Part 3 — Solve logarithmic equations; identify and discard extraneous solutions (24 pts). For each, show: the condensing step → conversion to exponential form → solution → domain check:
(a) log₃(x+2) = 4 (b) log₂(x) + log₂(x+2) = 3
Part 4 — Application: compound interest solving for time (26 pts). You invest $2,000 at 5% interest compounded continuously. (a) Write the formula A = Pe^(rt) with your numbers substituted. (b) Solve for the time t (in years) it takes for the investment to triple. Show every step: set up the equation, divide both sides by P, take ln of both sides, solve for t. (c) In two sentences, interpret your answer in plain language and name one assumption the model makes.
Integrity & AI note. This is your own work, submitted for grading. You may use an approved chatbot (Gemini, Claude, or ChatGPT) to help you think — check a step, test an interpretation — but submitting AI-generated solutions as your own is not allowed; if AI helped you think, add a one-line note of which tool and how. (Note: this is the traditional format. In this course's actual adaptive assignment, you work the problems with the chatbot and submit its self-scored report — see I-assignment-and-rubric-week-15.md.)
Rubric — 100 points
| Criterion (part) | Full credit | Partial | Little/none |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 — Same-base method (24) | All three: correct base identified, exponents equated, correct solution (24) | Two correct; one base-match error or linear-equation slip (13–20) | One or fewer correct; exponents treated as multipliers (0–10) |
| Part 2 — Log of both sides (26) | All three: power rule applied explicitly, correct exact form, correct decimal (26) | Two correct; one step missing or decimal off (14–22) | Log(b^x) treated as b·x, or one or fewer correct (0–12) |
| Part 3 — Log equations + extraneous (24) | Both: condense → convert → solve → domain check; extraneous solution discarded (24) | One fully correct; other has condensing or domain-check gap (13–20) | Domain check omitted or both incorrect (0–10) |
| Part 4 — Application + interpretation (26) | Formula correct with numbers; t ≈ 21.97 yr shown step-by-step; clear interpretation with units + plausible assumption (26) | Formula and algebra correct but interpretation missing units or assumption vague (14–22) | Formula wrong, or algebra not shown, or no interpretation (0–12) |
Levels describe observable differences so grading stays fast and consistent. (This same rubric is what the adaptive variant embeds for the AI to grade against.)
Instructor answer key — REMOVE BEFORE PUBLISHING TO STUDENTS
(All values pre-computed and independently re-verified — w15_verify.py, PASS — 45 checks clean.)
Part 1:
(a) 64 = 4³ → x = 3. (b) 32 = 2⁵ → 2x−1 = 5 → x = 3. (c) 9 = 3² → 3^(2x) = 3^(x+4) → 2x = x+4 → x = 4.
Part 2:
(a) x·ln(3) = ln(20) → x = ln(20)/ln(3) ≈ 2.727. (b) 2x·ln(5) = ln(80) → x = ln(80)/(2ln5) ≈ 1.361. (c) x−1 = ln(7) → x = 1+ln(7) ≈ 2.946.
Part 3:
(a) x+2 = 3⁴ = 81 → x = 79; domain: 81 > 0. ✓ (b) log₂[x(x+2)] = 3 → x(x+2) = 8 → x²+2x−8 = 0 → (x+4)(x−2) = 0 → x = 2 (valid) or x = −4 (extraneous: log₂(−4) undefined). Answer: x = 2 only.
Part 4:
(a) A = 2000·e^(0.05t); triple → A = 6000. (b) 6000 = 2000·e^(0.05t) → 3 = e^(0.05t) → ln(3) = 0.05t → t = ln(3)/0.05 ≈ 21.97 years. (c) Model answer: "At 5% compounded continuously, the investment triples in about 22 years. The model assumes the interest rate remains constant at 5%, which real accounts don't guarantee."
Canvas placement block
canvas_object = Assignment
title = "Week 15 Assignment — Solving Exponential & Logarithmic Equations (traditional)"
assignment_group = "Assignments"
points_possible = 100
grading_type = points
assignment_type = traditional
submission_types = [online_upload, online_text_entry]
due_offset_days = 6
published = true
rubric_ref = "week-15-assignment-rubric"
provenance = "~ Prof. Calloway's edition · Fall 2026 · built with thecoursemaker.com"
~ Prof. Calloway's edition · Fall 2026 · built with thecoursemaker.com