Week 4 — Quiz (auto-graded) · Thesis & Essay Structure
Course: English Composition (ENGL 1A) · Silver Oak University (fictional sample) · Prof. Lindgren
Objective tested: Objective 3 — the working/arguable thesis and essay arrangement (introduction, body, transitions, conclusion).
Points: 10 (1 each) · Assignment group: Quizzes (10% of grade) · Due: end of Module 4. AI is not permitted on quizzes.
This is the human-readable quiz with its vetted answer key and feedback. The import-ready Classic QTI is in
F-quiz-week-04-qti.xml(generated by a validated script — parses with 10 items, every single-answer item exactly one correct). The Canvas placement block is at the bottom of this file. No free-response items — all auto-gradable (MC / multiple-answer / matching / true-false).
Blueprint
| # | Type | Concept | Objective |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Multiple choice | Which statement is an arguable thesis (vs. topic/fact/question) | 3 |
| 2 | Multiple choice | The function of an introduction | 3 |
| 3 | Multiple choice | The function of a conclusion (synthesis, not repetition) | 3 |
| 4 | Multiple choice | What makes a thesis "arguable" | 3 |
| 5 | Multiple choice | Which thesis is the most specific | 3 |
| 6 | Matching | Essay part → its function (intro / thesis / body / transition / conclusion) | 3 |
| 7 | True / False | "A thesis can be phrased as a question" | 3 |
| 8 | Multiple answer | What a working thesis must be (arguable + specific) / what it must not be | 3 |
| 9 | Multiple choice | The "In this essay I will discuss…" impostor | 3 |
| 10 | Multiple choice | Reverse outlining tests structure | 3 |
No trick questions; distractors target the Week 4 misconceptions named in the lecture outline (thesis vs. topic/fact/question; arguable but vague; conclusion-as-restatement; transitions as sprinkle-in words).
Questions, key, and feedback
Q1 (MC). Which of the following is an arguable thesis (a claim a reasonable person could disagree with)?
- A. Social media is used by billions of people worldwide.
- B. Is social media harmful to teenagers?
- C. Schools should ban phones during the school day, because the attention cost outweighs the convenience. ✅
- D. In this essay, I will discuss the effects of social media.
Feedback: A thesis makes a contestable claim. C picks a side and says why. A is a fact (checkable; nothing to argue), B is a question (it asks, it doesn't claim), and D is an announcement (a plan, not a claim).
Q2 (MC). What is the main job of an essay's introduction?
- A. To list every point the body will make, like a summary
- B. To hook the reader, give brief context, and land the thesis ✅
- C. To restate the conclusion in advance
- D. To apologize for what the essay will not cover
Feedback: An introduction funnels — broad interest (hook) → narrowing context → the thesis, usually as the last sentence or two. It sets the claim up; the body delivers it.
Q3 (MC). A strong conclusion should mainly —
- A. repeat the thesis word for word
- B. introduce a brand-new argument the essay never made
- C. synthesize the points to show what they add up to and why the claim matters ✅
- D. simply say "In conclusion" and stop
Feedback: A conclusion does more than restate — and it doesn't spring a new argument. Synthesis answers the "so what?": what the points together mean, and why the claim matters.
Q4 (MC). A thesis is "arguable" when —
- A. it is long and uses formal vocabulary
- B. a reasonable person could disagree with it ✅
- C. it states a fact you can look up
- D. it is phrased as a question
Feedback: Arguable means a reader could take the other side. If no one could possibly say "I don't think so," there is nothing for the essay to prove. (Length, facts, and questions are not what makes a claim arguable.)
Q5 (MC). Which thesis is the most specific?
- A. Technology has changed education in many ways.
- B. Online learning is interesting and important.
- C. Requiring laptops in lecture courses harms learning more than it helps, because the same device that takes notes also delivers constant distraction. ✅
- D. Schools and technology are closely connected.
Feedback: Specific means it names what is claimed (laptops in lectures harm learning) and why (the note-taking device is also the distraction), narrow enough for one essay. The others are vague ("in many ways," "interesting," "connected") and could sit atop almost any paper.
Q6 (Matching). Match each part of an essay to its function.
| Part | Correct function |
|---|---|
| Introduction | Hooks the reader, gives brief context, and leads to the thesis |
| Thesis | States the essay's main arguable claim in one sentence |
| Body paragraph | Develops one supporting point for the thesis |
| Transition | Bridges ideas by showing how one point relates to the next |
| Conclusion | Synthesizes the points to show what they add up to |
Feedback: Each part has one job. Watch the classic mix-up: the conclusion synthesizes (shows what the points mean together) rather than merely repeating the thesis, and a transition shows a relationship (adds / contrasts / causes), not just sequence.
Q7 (True / False). "A thesis statement can be written as a question (for example, 'Is social media harmful to teenagers?')."
- True
- False ✅
Feedback: False. A question asks; a thesis answers it with a claim. A question can open an introduction, but the thesis is your contestable answer to that question — e.g., "Social media harms teenagers' sleep more than their self-esteem, and schools should address the sleep problem first."
Q8 (Multiple answer — select all that apply). A strong working thesis must be —
- A. Arguable — a reasonable person could disagree ✅
- B. Specific — it names what is claimed and (often) why ✅
- C. A statement of fact the reader can only confirm
- D. Phrased as a question for the reader to answer
- E. Allowed to be revised as your thinking sharpens while drafting ✅
Feedback: A working thesis is arguable, specific, and revisable (that's why it's "working"). It is not a fact (C — nothing to argue) and not a question (D — that asks rather than claims).
Q9 (MC). A student writes, "In this essay, I will discuss the pros and cons of remote work." The best revision into a real thesis would —
- A. keep it as is — it clearly states the topic
- B. delete the announcement and make a specific claim, e.g., "For early-career employees, fully remote work trades away the informal mentoring that builds careers, so a hybrid model serves them better." ✅
- C. turn it into a question: "What are the pros and cons of remote work?"
- D. make it longer and more formal without changing what it says
Feedback: "In this essay I will discuss…" announces a plan and refuses to pick a side ("pros and cons"). The fix is to state the claim itself — arguable and specific. Turning it into a question (C) just swaps one impostor for another.
Q10 (MC). After finishing a messy draft, you write one short phrase naming what each paragraph does, then read only that list to check whether the order makes sense. This move is —
- A. proofreading for typos and spelling
- B. reverse outlining — a test of the essay's structure ✅
- C. writing a stronger hook
- D. editing sentences for grammar
Feedback: Reverse outlining tests structure — it surfaces order problems and wandering paragraphs that re-reading the prose hides (prose can sound fine sentence by sentence even when the arrangement is wrong). It's a revision move, not a surface clean-up.
Answer key (quick reference)
| Q | Answer |
|---|---|
| 1 | C |
| 2 | B |
| 3 | C |
| 4 | B |
| 5 | C |
| 6 | Introduction→hook/context/leads to thesis / Thesis→main arguable claim / Body→develops one point / Transition→bridges ideas by relationship / Conclusion→synthesizes the points |
| 7 | False |
| 8 | A, B, E |
| 9 | B |
| 10 | B |
Quality gate (self-checked): each single-answer item (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q9, Q10, and the T/F Q7) has exactly one correct option; the multiple-answer item (Q8) keys A, B, E (and requires C and D left unselected); the matching item (Q6) pairs five parts to five distinct functions one-to-one. No quotations, sources, or citations appear in this quiz — every example thesis and sentence (the "phones" claim, the "laptops in lecture courses" claim, the "remote work / hybrid" claim, the "social media / sleep" claim) is the instructor's own illustration, attributed to no one — so there is nothing to mis-quote or misattribute. The thesis-vs-impostor, arguable-and-specific, introduction-funnel, and synthesis-conclusion content matches the Week-4 lecture outline exactly. No computation in this quiz. No free-response items. Citation-integrity + correct-conventions gate: PASS.
Item-bank entries (for variants + the midterm/final)
All ten items are tagged course=ENGL1A · week=4 · objective=3 · topic=thesis-and-essay-structure and deposited in Item Bank: Week 4 — Thesis & Essay Structure. The midterm (Week 8) and the per-term variant updates draw fresh items from this bank. (Tags: q1 arguable-thesis-vs-impostor, q2 introduction-function, q3 conclusion-synthesis, q4 arguable-defined, q5 most-specific-thesis, q6 essay-parts-match, q7 thesis-is-not-a-question, q8 working-thesis-criteria, q9 announcement-impostor, q10 reverse-outlining.)
Canvas placement block
canvas_object = Quizzes::Quiz
title = "Week 4 Quiz — Thesis & Essay Structure"
assignment_group = "Quizzes"
points_possible = 10
grading_type = points
due_offset_days = 6 # 6 days after module start
published = true
shuffle_answers = true
ai_permitted = false # AI is not permitted on quizzes
provenance = "~ Prof. Lindgren's edition · Fall 2026 · built with thecoursemaker.com"
F-quiz-week-04-qti.xml) ships inside the course's .imscc package — it lands in the Canvas gradebook on import.~ Prof. Lindgren's edition · Fall 2026 · built with thecoursemaker.com