Back to the English Composition outline The Course Maker
English Composition outline
Week 6 · Quiz

Week 6 — Quiz (auto-graded) · Rhetorical Analysis

English Composition · ENGL 1A Fall 2026 · Prof. Lindgren Fictional sample

Course: English Composition (ENGL 1A) · Silver Oak University (fictional sample) · Prof. Lindgren
Objective tested: Objective 4 — the rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos, kairos) and analyzing how a text persuades.
Points: 10 (1 each) · Assignment group: Quizzes (10% of grade) · Due: end of Module 6. AI is not permitted on quizzes.

This is the human-readable quiz with its vetted answer key and feedback. The import-ready Classic QTI is in F-quiz-week-06-qti.xml (generated by a validated script — parses with 10 items, every single-answer item exactly one correct). The Canvas placement block is at the bottom of this file. No free-response items — all auto-gradable (MC / multiple-answer / matching / true-false).
Source-integrity note: every passage in this quiz is the instructor's own illustration, attributed to no one — there are no quotations from "I Have a Dream" (or any real text) in the quiz, so there is nothing to mis-quote or misattribute. (The verified-quotation work happens in the assignment and studio.)


Blueprint

# Type Concept Objective
1 Multiple choice What rhetorical analysis is (vs. summary/agreement) 4
2 Multiple choice Identify the appeal — ethos 4
3 Multiple choice Identify the appeal — pathos 4
4 Multiple choice Identify the appeal — kairos 4
5 Multiple choice "Ethos" defined 4
6 Matching Appeal → definition 4
7 Multiple choice Identify the device — anaphora 4
8 Multiple choice Why "the author uses pathos" isn't yet analysis 4
9 True / False "Rhetorical analysis means saying whether you agree" misconception 4
10 Multiple answer Which sentences are analysis (not summary/agreement) 4

No trick questions; distractors target the Week 6 misconceptions named in the lecture outline (summary vs. analysis vs. agreement; label-not-analysis; ethos vs. logos).


Questions, key, and feedback

Q1 (MC). A rhetorical analysis of a speech mainly explains —
- A. whether you agree with the speaker's position
- B. how the text tries to persuade its audience — its strategies and their effects
- C. what the speech says, in a shorter form (a summary)
- D. the speaker's biography and historical background
Feedback: Rhetorical analysis is about strategyhow a text persuades and to what effect. (A is agreement/your position; C is summary; D is background. You may use a little of C and D, but the analysis is B.)

Q2 (MC). "As an ER nurse for the past fifteen years, I have watched these budget cuts play out at the bedside." This move most directly appeals to —
- A. ethos (the speaker's credibility/character)
- B. pathos (emotion)
- C. logos (logic/evidence)
- D. kairos (timing)
Feedback: Leaning on the speaker's experience to earn the audience's trust is ethos. The credentials say believe me because of who I am and what I've seen.

Q3 (MC). "Picture a five-year-old doing her homework by candlelight because the power's been shut off again." This move most directly appeals to —
- A. ethos (credibility)
- B. pathos (emotion)
- C. logos (logic/evidence)
- D. kairos (timing)
Feedback: The vivid, sympathetic image is built to make the audience feel — that's pathos. (A statistic about outages would lean logos; the image is pathos.)

Q4 (MC). A hardware store runs an ad for backup generators the morning after a citywide blackout. The persuasive force of choosing that moment is an appeal to —
- A. ethos (credibility)
- B. pathos (emotion)
- C. logos (logic/evidence)
- D. kairos (the timeliness of the occasion)
Feedback: Kairos is the right-moment appeal: the argument lands because of when it arrives. The same ad a month earlier would have far less force.

Q5 (MC). In rhetorical analysis, ethos most nearly means —
- A. the appeal to the speaker's credibility and character — why the audience should trust them
- B. the appeal to the audience's emotions
- C. the logical structure and evidence of the argument
- D. the timing or occasion of the message
Feedback: Ethos = credibility/character (B is pathos, C is logos, D is kairos). Watch the classic mix-up with logos: ethos is about trusting the speaker; logos is about the reasoning itself.

Q6 (Matching). Match each appeal to its definition.
| Appeal | Correct definition |
|---|---|
| Ethos | The appeal to the speaker's credibility and character |
| Pathos | The appeal to the audience's emotions |
| Logos | The appeal to logic, evidence, and reasoning |
| Kairos | The appeal to the timeliness of the moment or occasion |
Feedback: The four appeals, one to one. Three come from Aristotle (ethos, pathos, logos); kairos — the opportune moment — is the fourth.

Q7 (MC). A writer opens five sentences in a row with the same words — "We will rebuild." Naming this repetition at the start of successive clauses identifies the device —
- A. metaphor
- B. antithesis
- C. anaphora
- D. allusion
Feedback: Anaphora is repetition at the beginning of successive clauses/sentences, often used to build emotional momentum (pathos). (Metaphor reframes one thing as another; antithesis pairs opposites; allusion references something outside the text.)

Q8 (MC). A student writes, "The author uses pathos." Why is this not yet a complete rhetorical analysis?
- A. Because you should never mention pathos in an analysis
- B. Because it only labels the appeal — analysis must also explain HOW the move works and its EFFECT on the audience
- C. Because pathos is not a real appeal
- D. Because the student should have agreed or disagreed with the author first
Feedback: Naming the appeal is step one of three. Real analysis adds the how (which move creates the pathos) and the effect (on which audience). A bare label is not analysis.

Q9 (True / False). "Writing a rhetorical analysis of a speech means explaining whether you agree with it."
- True
- False
Feedback: False. Whether you agree is your position on the issue. A rhetorical analysis explains how the text persuades — its appeals and devices and their effects — and can be written just as well about a text you disagree with. (This analysis-not-agreement line is the highest-value idea of the week.)

Q10 (Multiple answer — select all that apply). Which of the following sentences are analysis of strategy (not summary and not agreement)?
- A. "By repeating a single hopeful phrase at the start of clause after clause, the writer builds a rising momentum that makes the goal feel inevitable to a weary audience."
- B. "The speech argues that the law should be changed."
- C. "The 'unpaid debt' metaphor reframes a moral plea as a logical claim — a bill that is simply overdue — which lets a skeptical audience treat the demand as fair rather than radical."
- D. "I think the speaker is completely right about this."
- E. "Opening with the audience's own shared values establishes the speaker's credibility before any argument begins, lowering the listeners' resistance."
Feedback: A, C, and E each name a move and its effect on an audience — that's analysis. B summarizes (what it says); D agrees (your position). Analysis points at the machinery of persuasion.


Answer key (quick reference)

Q Answer
1 B
2 A
3 B
4 D
5 A
6 Ethos→credibility/character / Pathos→emotions / Logos→logic/evidence / Kairos→timeliness of the occasion
7 C
8 B
9 False
10 A, C, E

Quality gate (self-checked): each single-answer item (Q1–Q5, Q7, Q8, and the T/F Q9) has exactly one correct option; the multiple-answer item (Q10) keys A, C, E (and requires B and D left unselected); the matching item (Q6) pairs four appeals to four distinct definitions one-to-one. No quotations, sources, or citations appear in this quiz — every passage is the instructor's own illustration, attributed to no one — so there is nothing to mis-quote or misattribute (the verified-quotation work lives in the assignment and studio). The ethos/logos distractors and the analysis/summary/agreement distractors target the week's named misconceptions. No computation in this quiz. No free-response items. Citation-integrity + correct-conventions gate: PASS.


Item-bank entries (for variants + the midterm/final)

All ten items are tagged course=ENGL1A · week=6 · objective=4 · topic=rhetorical-analysis-appeals and deposited in Item Bank: Week 6 — Rhetorical Analysis (the Appeals). The midterm (Week 8) and the per-term variant updates draw fresh items from this bank. (Tags: q1 analysis-vs-summary-vs-agreement, q2 identify-ethos, q3 identify-pathos, q4 identify-kairos, q5 ethos-defined, q6 appeal-definition-match, q7 device-anaphora, q8 label-not-analysis, q9 analysis-not-agreement, q10 analysis-multi.)

Canvas placement block

canvas_object   = Quizzes::Quiz
title           = "Week 6 Quiz — Rhetorical Analysis (the Appeals)"
assignment_group = "Quizzes"
points_possible = 10
grading_type    = points
due_offset_days = 6        # 6 days after module start
published       = true
shuffle_answers = true
ai_permitted    = false    # AI is not permitted on quizzes
provenance      = "~ Prof. Lindgren's edition · Fall 2026 · built with thecoursemaker.com"
This is the human-readable quiz with its vetted answer key and rationale. The import-ready Classic-QTI version (F-quiz-week-06-qti.xml) ships inside the course's .imscc package — it lands in the Canvas gradebook on import.

~ Prof. Lindgren's edition · Fall 2026 · built with thecoursemaker.com