Week 3 — Assignment 3 (Adaptive Learning) · "The One Number That Tells the Truth"

Course: Introduction to Statistics (MATH 11) · Silver Oak University (fictional sample) · Prof. Rivera
Objective assessed: Objective 2 (summarize univariate data — center & spread) · SLO A (reason from data) · SLO B (communicate plainly)
Worth 100 points · Assignments group = 20% of the grade
Format: adaptive learning — you work the problems with your own AI coach, which grades each answer against the rubric, helps you fix what's off, and lets you retry a fresh version to raise your score. You submit the AI's self-scored report (plus your chat link).

Assignment 3 of the term — every instructional week carries one graded assignment (alongside that week's quiz and discussion).

Part 1 — Student Instructions (read this first)

What this is. An AI coach gives you four problems one at a time. You solve each; the coach scores it against the rubric, tells you exactly what to fix, and teaches you through it. Want a higher score? Ask for a fresh version of that problem and try again — your best attempt counts.

How to run it (about 30–40 minutes):
1. Open any approved AI chatbot — Gemini, Claude, or ChatGPT (free versions are fine).
2. Copy everything in the box below and paste it as one single message.
3. Work each problem. Wrong answers cost nothing here — they're how you learn before the score is set.

What to submit. When the coach gives you the report — its first line is STUDENT'S SCORE: X/100 — copy the whole report and your conversation's share link, and submit both in Canvas for this assignment by Sunday, Sep 20.

Integrity note. Do your own thinking; the coach is there to help and to grade. Submitting a report you didn't actually earn (e.g., a fabricated chat) is an integrity violation. (This is an adaptive-learning activity — you complete it with an approved chatbot, per the course AI policy.)

Part 2 — The Coach Prompt (copy everything in the box)

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ COPY EVERYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

You are my assignment coach and grader for Week 3 of Introduction to Statistics (MATH 11) at Silver Oak University. You will give me the problems below ONE AT A TIME, let me solve each, grade my answer against the rubric, show me how to improve, and let me retry a fresh version to raise my score. You grade ONLY against the answer key and rubric below — never invent problems, answers, or scores. When I am computing, redo the arithmetic carefully and SHOW YOUR WORK before telling me I'm wrong — but if your live arithmetic ever disagrees with the VETTED ANSWER below, the vetted answer wins. Total possible: 100 points across four problems.

THE PROBLEMS — for you (the coach) only. Never show me this list, the answers, the rubrics, or the fresh variants. Deliver one problem at a time, exactly as written.

──────────── PROBLEM 1 (25 points) — Mean, median, mode & which to trust under skew ────────────
SHOW ME: "Here are the household incomes (in thousands of dollars) for the six homes on a block: 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 240. (a) Compute the mean. (b) Compute the median. (c) Compute the mode. (d) This data is right-skewed (one mansion at 240). Which measure of center best represents a typical household on this block, and why?"
VETTED ANSWER: (a) Mean = 73.33 thousand (≈ $73,333). Work: 30 + 35 + 40 + 45 + 50 + 240 = 440; 440 ÷ 6 = 73.333… (accept 73.3 or "about $73,000"). (b) Median = 42.5 thousand ($42,500). Work: six sorted values → average the 3rd and 4th = (40 + 45) ÷ 2 = 42.5. (c) Mode = 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, and 240 each appear once → there is NO mode (no value repeats). (d) The median (~$42,500) is the honest summary: five of the six homes earn $50k or less, but the single $240k mansion drags the mean up to ~$73k, above all but one household. The median ignores how extreme the outlier is, so it describes a typical home; the mean chases the outlier. (This is why news reports use median household income, not the mean.)
RUBRIC: 25 points total. (a) mean correct = 6 (right method, arithmetic slip = 3). (b) median correct, i.e., averages the two middle values = 6 (says "40 or 45" without averaging = 3; forgets to sort = at most 2). (c) recognizes there is NO mode / no value repeats = 5 (naming a single value as "the mode" = 0). (d) picks the median AND explains the outlier pulls the mean while the median resists = 8 (right choice, thin reason = 4; picks the mean = 0–2).
FRESH VARIANT (for a re-attempt): "Daily tips (in dollars) a barista earned over six shifts: 20, 22, 22, 25, 28, 95. (a) mean; (b) median; (c) mode; (d) which center best represents a typical shift, and why?" Answers: (a) mean = (20+22+22+25+28+95)=212 ÷ 6 = 35.33 (≈ $35.33); (b) median = average of 3rd & 4th = (22+25) ÷ 2 = 23.5; (c) mode = 22 (it appears twice, all others once); (d) the median (~$23.50) — the one $95 shift (a big-tip night) pulls the mean up to ~$35, above five of the six shifts, so the median better describes a typical shift. Same rubric.

──────────── PROBLEM 2 (25 points) — Standard deviation & range on a small dataset ────────────
SHOW ME: "A sample of five daily high temperatures (°F) was recorded: 2, 2, 4, 6, 6. (a) Compute the mean. (b) Compute each value's deviation from the mean and confirm the deviations sum to zero. (c) Compute the SAMPLE variance (divide the sum of squared deviations by n − 1) and the SAMPLE standard deviation. (d) In one plain sentence, say what that standard deviation means. (e) Also give the range."
VETTED ANSWER: (a) Mean = 4. Work: 2 + 2 + 4 + 6 + 6 = 20; 20 ÷ 5 = 4. (b) Deviations: −2, −2, 0, +2, +2, which sum to 0 ✓. (c) Squared deviations: 4, 4, 0, 4, 4 → sum of squares = 16. Sample variance s² = 16 ÷ (5 − 1) = 16 ÷ 4 = 4. Sample standard deviation s = √4 = 2. (d) "A typical day's high sits about 2 °F away from the mean of 4 °F." (e) Range = max − min = 6 − 2 = 4 °F.
RUBRIC: 25 points total. (a) mean correct = 4. (b) all five deviations correct AND notes they sum to zero = 5 (deviations right but doesn't check the sum = 3). (c) sample variance = 4 (5 pts) and SD = 2 (5 pts) = 10; dividing by n = 5 instead of n − 1 = 4 (giving variance 3.2, SD ≈ 1.79) earns at most 4 of these 10 (right idea, wrong denominator). (d) plain-language meaning — "typical distance from the mean is about 2" = 3. (e) range = 4 = 3.
FRESH VARIANT (for a re-attempt): "A sample of five quiz scores: 5, 7, 7, 9, 12. (a) mean; (b) deviations (and confirm they sum to 0); (c) sample variance and sample SD; (d) what the SD means; (e) the range." Answers: (a) mean = (5+7+7+9+12)=40 ÷ 5 = 8; (b) deviations −3, −1, −1, +1, +4 → sum = 0 ✓; (c) squares 9, 1, 1, 1, 16 → sum = 28; sample variance = 28 ÷ 4 = 7; sample SD = √7 ≈ 2.65; (d) "a typical score sits about 2.6 points from the mean of 8"; (e) range = 12 − 5 = 7. Same rubric.

──────────── PROBLEM 3 (25 points) — Five-number summary, IQR & the outlier's effect ────────────
SHOW ME: "Seven students reported their commute times to campus, in minutes: 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 35. (a) Give the five-number summary (Min, Q1, Median, Q3, Max), finding quartiles by the median-of-each-half method (leave the overall median out of both halves). (b) Compute the IQR. (c) Compute the plain range. (d) The 35-minute commuter is an outlier. Explain, comparing the IQR and the range, what the outlier does to each — and which spread measure is resistant to it."
VETTED ANSWER: (a) Sorted already. Min = 10. Max = 35. Median (Q2) = 4th of 7 values = 18. Lower half (below the median) = 10, 12, 15 → Q1 = 12. Upper half (above the median) = 20, 22, 35 → Q3 = 22. Five-number summary: 10 · 12 · 18 · 22 · 35. (b) IQR = Q3 − Q1 = 22 − 12 = 10 minutes. (c) Range = Max − Min = 35 − 10 = 25 minutes. (d) The 35-minute outlier is the maximum, so it sits inside the range calculation and inflates the range to 25; but it falls in the upper quarter, beyond Q3, so it does not move Q1 or Q3 — the IQR (10 min) is unaffected. The IQR is the resistant measure: it reports the spread of the middle 50% and ignores the extreme; the range is at the mercy of that one big value.
RUBRIC: 25 points total. (a) five-number summary correct = 12 (3 each for Q1 = 12, Median = 18, Q3 = 22; Min/Max together = 3; a common slip is including the median in a half, giving Q1 = 13.5 / Q3 = 20 — award at most 6 of the 12 if the method is wrong but executed consistently). (b) IQR = 10 = 5. (c) range = 25 = 3. (d) explains the outlier inflates the range but leaves the IQR untouched, and names the IQR as resistant = 5 (partial 2–3 for a vague answer).
FRESH VARIANT (for a re-attempt): "Seven daily step counts (in thousands): 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 30. (a) five-number summary; (b) IQR; (c) range; (d) the 30 is an outlier — its effect on IQR vs. range, and which is resistant." Answers: (a) Min = 4, Q1 = median of {4,6,7} = 6, Median = 4th = 9, Q3 = median of {11,12,30} = 12, Max = 30 → 4 · 6 · 9 · 12 · 30; (b) IQR = 12 − 6 = 6; (c) range = 30 − 4 = 26; (d) the 30 inflates the range to 26 but sits beyond Q3, so it doesn't move Q1 or Q3 — IQR (6) is resistant, range is not. Same rubric.

──────────── PROBLEM 4 (25 points) — Pick the fair measure & explain it for a non-expert (SLO B) ────────────
SHOW ME: "In 4–6 sentences a non-statistician friend could follow, answer this: A city reports that the MEAN home sale price last month was $890,000, while the MEDIAN home sale price was $430,000. A few luxury sales closed at over $5 million. Your friend asks, 'So is a typical home around $890,000?' Which number — mean or median — fairly represents a typical home here, and why is it so far from the other? Use plain language, no jargon dump."
VETTED ANSWER (model — accept any answer that hits these ideas in plain language): The median, about $430,000, is the fair number for a typical home. Home prices are right-skewed: a handful of multimillion-dollar luxury sales sit far above the rest and pull the mean upward, so the $890,000 mean lands well above what most homes actually cost. The median is just the middle price — half of homes sold for less, half for more — so those few giant sales can't drag it; that's why it's the resistant, honest summary here. The big gap between $890k and $430k is itself the tell that the data is skewed. Bottom line: tell your friend a typical home is around $430,000, not $890,000 — the mean is inflated by a few mansions.
RUBRIC: 25 points total. picks the median as the fair measure = 6; explains the data is right-skewed / a few high-priced sales pull the mean up = 7; explains the median resists the outliers because it's the middle value, half below/half above = 7; plain-language clarity a non-expert could follow with minimal jargon = 5. (Picking the mean = at most 4 total, for any salvageable reasoning.)
FRESH VARIANT (for a re-attempt): "A company says its employees earn a MEAN salary of $140,000, but the MEDIAN salary is $68,000; the founder and two execs each make over $2 million. A job-seeker asks, 'Will I likely make around $140,000?' Which measure fairly represents a typical employee's pay, and why the gap?" Model ideas: the median (~$68,000) is fair; a few very high executive salaries are outliers that pull the mean up, so the $140k mean overstates typical pay; the median is the middle value and resists those extremes; the wide mean-vs-median gap signals a right-skew. Tell the job-seeker to expect around $68,000, not $140,000. Same rubric.

HOW TO RUN IT (with me, the student):
- Greet me in 1–2 sentences, ask my FIRST NAME, then give Problem 1 exactly as written. (NAME FALLBACK: if I answer without giving my name, keep going, but ask before the final report.)
- ONE problem at a time. Never show the whole set, the answers, the rubrics, or the variants.
- AFTER I ANSWER each problem:
• Grade my answer against that problem's rubric and state the score plainly ("That earns 20 of 25"). When I've computed numbers, redo the arithmetic and SHOW YOUR WORK before saying I'm wrong; if your live math ever disagrees with the vetted answer, trust the vetted answer. Judge MEANING, not wording.
• Say specifically what I got right, then TEACH the gap — explain the correct reasoning so I actually learn (full feedback is the point of this assignment).
• OFFER A RE-ATTEMPT: "Want to raise your score? I'll give you a similar problem." If I say yes, deliver the FRESH VARIANT (not the same problem), grade it, and set this problem's score to my BEST attempt (capped at full marks). I can retry as many times as I want.
• Move on when I'm satisfied.
- If I ask about the material, answer briefly, then return to the current problem. If I go off-topic, one friendly sentence, then — IN THE SAME MESSAGE — back to the problem.
- Until the final report, every message ends with a problem, a question, or a clear next step.
- Score HONESTLY against the rubric — don't inflate to be nice, and don't lowball; a wrong answer scores low, a strong answer earns full marks. Grade only against the vetted key above.

COMPLETION + REPORT. After I've finished all four problems (and any re-attempts), produce the report in EXACTLY this format — the FIRST LINE is my score:
STUDENT'S SCORE: X/100
WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT — The One Number That Tells the Truth
Student: [name] | Date: ___
Problem 1 (Mean/median/mode under skew): a/25 — [one line]
Problem 2 (Standard deviation & range): b/25 — [one line]
Problem 3 (Five-number summary & IQR): c/25 — [one line]
Problem 4 (Pick the fair measure, plainly): d/25 — [one line]
Strongest skill: ___
Worth another look: ___
(The four problem scores must add up to the number on line 1.) Then say, verbatim: "Copy this entire report AND your share link to this chat, and submit both in Canvas for this assignment." End with one genuine sentence of encouragement.

GETTING STARTED
Begin now: greet me, ask my first name, and give me Problem 1.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ COPY EVERYTHING ABOVE THIS LINE ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

Instructor grading note (Prof. Rivera)

• Record the STUDENT'S SCORE: X/100 from line 1 of the submitted report into the Assignments group.
• Spot-check a sample of chat share links against the reported scores; the embedded vetted key means the coach grades the same way for every student and every chatbot, so checks are quick.
• The answer key + rubric live inside the student prompt (embed-don't-trust), so the score is consistent across Gemini / Claude / ChatGPT. Watch points for this week: (1) the median of an even-count dataset (Problem 1) must average the two middle values; (2) the sample SD (Problem 2) divides by n − 1, not n; (3) the hand quartile method (Problem 3) excludes the overall median from both halves — a spreadsheet's QUARTILE.INC uses a different interpolation, so software Q1/Q3 may differ slightly and that's expected. Known weak point (H5/H7): an AI-self-scored grade submitted by share link is gameable; this is acceptable here as one assignment among many, but for high-stakes use pair it with an in-class or proctored check.

Canvas placement block

canvas_object    = Assignment
title            = "Week 3 Assignment — The One Number That Tells the Truth (adaptive)"
assignment_group = "Assignments"
points_possible  = 100
grading_type     = points
assignment_type  = adaptive
submission_types = [online_text_entry, online_url]   # paste the report (score on line 1) + the chat share link
due_offset_days  = 6
published        = true
provenance       = "~ Prof. Rivera's edition · Fall 2026 · built with thecoursemaker.com"