Week 3 — Lecture Outline · Demand
Course: Principles of Microeconomics (ECON 1) · Silver Oak University (fictional sample) · Prof. Kessler
Objective 2 — demand, supply & market equilibrium; comparative statics · SLO A & B
Meeting pattern: two 75-min sessions (≈150 min). Segment minutes below total ~150 — scale to your room.
The deck (E), the tutorial (C), and the workshop (P) all teach from this outline. Every number here is pre-computed and independently verified.
Week at a glance
| Big question | What determines how much of something people buy — and what happens to that relationship when the world changes? |
| By week's end students can | (1) state the law of demand; (2) read a demand schedule and plot a demand curve; (3) distinguish movement along from a shift; (4) name and apply all six determinants; (5) classify normal/inferior and substitute/complement. |
| Key vocabulary | demand, law of demand, demand schedule, demand curve, quantity demanded, movement along, shift of the demand curve, determinants of demand, normal good, inferior good, substitute, complement, expectations |
| Materials | whiteboard; the Week-3 readings/links; Desmos or a spreadsheet; an approved chatbot |
| Timing note | 8 segments ≈ 150 min across two sessions. |
Segment 1 — HOOK: "Why does Uber surge?" (10 min)
Open with a scenario: it's 11 p.m. on a Friday and Uber's price just jumped from $12 to $30 for the same trip. Show of hands — who has put the phone down and decided to wait? Nearly everyone. The hook: buyers respond to prices, and economists can make that response precise. This week we build the model that shows exactly how.
Segment 2 — PLAIN-LANGUAGE IDEA: the law of demand (12 min)
Teach it in one sentence first:
The law of demand: as the price of a good rises (all else equal), the quantity demanded falls; as price falls, quantity demanded rises.
The intuition: higher prices make a good less attractive relative to alternatives. Two reasons: the substitution effect (the good is now more expensive compared to alternatives, so buyers switch) and the income effect (a higher price eats more of a budget, leaving less purchasing power). Keep it plain: "when coffee costs more, some people switch to tea or make it at home."
Two critical definitions:
- Demand — the entire price-quantity relationship (the schedule or curve).
- Quantity demanded — the specific amount buyers want at one particular price.
The trap to name right now: "demand went down because the price went up" — that is a movement along the demand curve, not a change in demand itself. We'll develop this distinction fully in Segment 5.
Segment 3 — WORKED EXAMPLE: reading a demand schedule (15 min)
Write on the board; do every row out loud.
The week's model: Qd = 120 − 10P
| Price (P) | Quantity Demanded (Qd) |
|---|---|
| $2 | 100 |
| $4 | 80 |
| $6 | 60 |
| $8 | 40 |
✅ VERIFIED NUMBERS (pre-computed; do not recompute live)
- P=2: Qd = 120 − 10(2) = 100. ✓
- P=4: Qd = 120 − 10(4) = 80. ✓
- P=6: Qd = 120 − 10(6) = 60. ✓
- P=8: Qd = 120 − 10(8) = 40. ✓
- Inverse form: P = 12 − 0.1Q. Check: Q=80 → P = 12 − 0.1(80) = 4. ✓
Walk through each row: "at a price of $4, buyers want 80 units — that's the quantity demanded." Then plot four points in Desmos and connect them into a downward-sloping curve. The negative slope is the law of demand made visible.
Segment 4 — THE DEMAND CURVE as a graph (18 min)
Price on the vertical axis, quantity on the horizontal (the convention every economist uses). The downward slope is the law of demand — higher price → lower quantity demanded. Ask: "What's the y-intercept?" At P=12 (from the inverse form P = 12 − 0.1Q), Qd = 0 — no one buys at $12. At P=0, Qd = 120. These two intercepts define the line.
What makes the curve steep vs. flat? (Plant the seed for Week 5 elasticity.) A steep demand curve means buyers don't adjust much when price changes; a flat one means they adjust a lot. Critical: steepness ≠ the only thing that matters — a shorter curve is NOT "less responsive." We'll formalize this with elasticity in Week 5.
Point on the curve vs. shift of the curve: slide a finger along the curve (P changes, Q changes — that's a movement) versus imagine the whole line moving left or right (that's a shift). Draw both motions on the board.
Segment 5 — MOVEMENT ALONG vs. SHIFT: the central distinction (22 min)
This is the most-tested concept in demand theory. Spend real time here.
Movement along the demand curve: caused ONLY by a change in the good's own price. Everything else held constant (ceteris paribus). On the graph: you slide from one point to another along the same curve.
Shift of the demand curve: caused by a change in a determinant (anything other than the good's own price). On the graph: the entire curve moves to a new position.
THE SIX DETERMINANTS — each one shifts demand:
| Determinant | Increase → demand shifts | Decrease → demand shifts |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Income (normal good) | RIGHT (↑D) | LEFT (↓D) |
| 1. Income (inferior good) | LEFT (↓D) | RIGHT (↑D) |
| 2. Price of a substitute | RIGHT (↑D) | LEFT (↓D) |
| 3. Price of a complement | LEFT (↓D) | RIGHT (↑D) |
| 4. Tastes/preferences | RIGHT if more popular | LEFT if less popular |
| 5. Expectations (price will ↑) | RIGHT (buy more now) | LEFT (buy less now) |
| 6. Number of buyers | RIGHT | LEFT |
Memory device: "T-I-P-S-E-N" — Tastes, Income, Price of related goods, Size of market (buyers), Expectations, Number of buyers.
Drill the classic errors:
- "Coffee prices rose, so demand for coffee fell." → WRONG terminology. Demand (the curve) didn't change — the quantity demanded fell. Call it a movement along.
- "People started preferring oat milk over cow's milk, so demand for cow's milk shifted left." → Correct. Tastes changed → a shift.
- "Coffee prices rose, so demand for tea shifted right." → Correct. Price of a substitute changed → a shift of demand for tea.
Segment 6 — NORMAL vs. INFERIOR; SUBSTITUTE vs. COMPLEMENT (18 min)
Normal good: when income rises, demand rises. (Most goods: restaurant meals, new clothes, cars.) Income and demand move in the same direction.
Inferior good: when income rises, demand falls. (Bus rides when you can now afford a car; ramen noodles when income is higher.) Income and demand move in opposite directions.
Substitutes: two goods where a rise in the price of one increases demand for the other. (Coffee and tea; Lyft and Uber; a store-brand and a name-brand.)
Complements: two goods where a rise in the price of one decreases demand for the other. (Hot dogs and hot dog buns; streaming service and a new TV; gasoline and SUVs.)
Quick classroom interaction: pair students to classify three pairs: (1) Uber and Lyft; (2) popcorn and movies at the theater; (3) bus rides and income falling. (Answers: substitutes; complements; bus rides likely an inferior good — demand for them rises when income falls.)
Segment 7 — TECHNOLOGY WORKFLOW + AI-CRITIQUE (20 min)
Live Desmos demo: type y = 12 - 0.1x (the inverse demand P = 12 − 0.1Q, with y=P and x=Q). Read off Q at P=4 (Q=80) and P=6 (Q=60) by dragging the trace.
AI-critique moment: ask an approved chatbot: "If the price of coffee rises, does demand for coffee shift left?" Correct answer: No — the price of coffee's own change causes a movement along the demand curve, not a shift. Chatbots frequently confuse movement along with a shift and will say "demand falls" when they mean "quantity demanded falls." Have students catch the error.
Segment 8 — CALLBACKS, TEASE & THE WEEK'S WORK (10 min — second session close)**
- Callback to Week 1 & 2: demand is a model — like the PPF, it simplifies reality. Ceteris paribus is the economist's "holding everything else constant" so we can isolate one relationship at a time.
- Tease Week 4: "Next week we build the other side — supply — and find where the two curves cross. That crossing point, the equilibrium, is where markets settle, and every news story about prices is really about what's shifting which curve."
- The week's work: Lecture Tutorial, Practice, Quiz 3, Discussion 3, Assignment 3, and Workshop 3.
Instructor FAQ — common stumbles
- "Demand fell because prices fell" (mixing up direction). No — lower prices raise quantity demanded (movement along), they don't cause demand to fall. The direction of the law of demand goes: ↑P → ↓Qd, ↓P → ↑Qd.
- "What's the difference between demand and quantity demanded?" Demand = the whole schedule/curve. Quantity demanded = a single point on that curve at one price.
- "How do I know which way the shift goes?" Ask: does the determinant make buyers want MORE or LESS at any given price? More → right shift. Less → left shift.
- "Why is price on the vertical axis?" Historical convention (Alfred Marshall). It can feel backwards if you think of P as the independent variable. Just accept the convention and remember: on a demand curve, moving UP the vertical axis means higher price → lower quantity.
- "Is an inferior good a bad product?" No — it just means demand falls when income rises. Many perfectly fine goods become less popular as people get richer (bus rides, instant noodles).
~ Prof. Kessler's edition · Fall 2026 · built with thecoursemaker.com