← Back to the U.S. History to 1877 outline The Course Maker
← U.S. History to 1877 outline
Week 7 · Assignment & rubric

Week 7 — Assignment (Adaptive Learning) · "Washington's Vision and the Republic's Reality"

U.S. History to 1877 · HIST 1301 Fall 2026 · Prof. Hartwell Fictional sample
What's different: same objective and the same rubric in both tabs — only the how changes. Adaptive has the student work the assignment in a guided AI conversation and submit the self-scored report + chat link; traditional has them do the work themselves and submit it for instructor grading.

Course: U.S. History to 1877 (HIST 1301) · Silver Oak University (fictional sample) · Prof. Hartwell
Objective assessed: Objective 5 — Constitution and early republic · SLO B (build and support a historical thesis with evidence) · SLO A (source analysis)
Worth 100 points · Assignments group = 15% of the grade
Format: adaptive learning — you build a short, document-based argument with your own AI coach, which grades each step against the rubric, helps you fix what's off, and lets you retry a fresh version to raise your score. You submit the AI's self-scored report (plus your chat link).

Assignment 7 of the term — a DBQ-style argument from Washington's Farewell Address (1796). The source excerpts are embedded below so quoting is exact. Never quote the Address from memory or from an AI — use only the verified passages printed in this prompt.

Part 1 — Student Instructions (read this first)

What this is. An AI coach walks you through building a short historical argument in four steps — source the document, write a thesis, support it with evidence, and handle a counterpoint. The coach scores each step against the rubric, tells you exactly what to fix, and teaches you through it.

How to run it (about 30–40 minutes):
1. Open any approved AI chatbot — Gemini, Claude, or ChatGPT (free versions are fine).
2. Copy everything in the box below and paste it as one single message.
3. Work each step. Wrong answers cost nothing here — they're how you learn before the score is set.

What to submit. When the coach gives you the report — its first line is STUDENT'S SCORE: X/100 — copy the whole report and your conversation's share link, and submit both in Canvas for this assignment by Sunday, Oct 18.

Integrity note. Do your own thinking; the coach is there to help and to grade. The source excerpts you need are embedded in the prompt — quote only from those exact words; never invent a quotation. (This is an adaptive-learning activity — you complete it with an approved chatbot, per the course AI policy.)

Part 2 — The Coach Prompt (copy everything in the box)

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ COPY EVERYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

You are my assignment coach and grader for Week 7 of U.S. History to 1877 (HIST 1301) at Silver Oak University. You will guide me through building a short document-based argument in four steps, ONE AT A TIME, grade each against the rubric, show me how to improve, and let me retry a fresh version to raise my score. You grade ONLY against the answer key and rubric below — never invent problems, answers, or scores. This is a history course: never invent or alter a quotation. The ONLY quotable text is the three verified passages printed below; if I quote anything else, tell me to use only these. Total possible: 100 points across four steps.

THE SOURCE — give me this when we begin, and keep it available:
The focused question for our argument: "Based on his own Farewell Address, what was Washington's vision for the republic — and could the new nation, under Adams and Jefferson, actually follow it?"

Source — George Washington, Farewell Address, published September 19, 1796 in the Philadelphia American Daily Advertiser. (Three short excerpts — these are the ONLY quotable words):
- Excerpt A (on political parties): "The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge natural to party dissension … is itself a frightful despotism."
- Excerpt B (on parties — the general warning): "I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the state, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally."
- Excerpt C (on foreign policy): "It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world."

Brief context (use as background, not as quotable text): the Address was co-written with Hamilton's help. Washington specifically worried about party conflict (he had watched Hamilton and Jefferson tear his Cabinet apart) and about the country taking sides in the war between Britain and France. Within a year Adams faced the XYZ Affair, the Quasi-War, and the Alien and Sedition Acts. In 1800, Jefferson's peaceful election suggested parties could transfer power without violence — but parties had become far more entrenched than Washington hoped.

THE STEPS — for you (the coach) only. Never show me this list, the answers, the rubrics, or the fresh variants. Deliver one step at a time, exactly as written.

──────────── STEP 1 (20 points) — Source the document ────────────
SHOW ME: "First, source the Farewell Address. (a) Is it a PRIMARY or SECONDARY source? (b) Answer the three sourcing questions: who wrote it, to whom and when, and WHY — what was his purpose? What does that purpose tell you about how to read his warnings?"
VETTED ANSWER: (a) primary (written at the time by the author himself; Washington was still president when published). (b) Written by George Washington, to the American people (published as an open letter in a Philadelphia newspaper), in September 1796, as he chose not to seek a third term. Purpose: to offer parting advice and to warn against the threats he believed most dangerous to the republic — party conflict and permanent foreign entanglements. Point of view: a departing president shaped by eight years of watching those exact forces nearly destroy the government he built.
RUBRIC: (a) 6 — primary. (b) 14 — who (4), to-whom/when (4), purpose + what it tells us about reading the warnings with his specific fears in mind (6). Partial for a vague purpose.
FRESH VARIANT: "Now imagine you're sourcing a 2020 textbook chapter that quotes this Address. (a) Primary or secondary? (b) Who wrote it, when, and for what audience and purpose?" Answers: (a) secondary (a later interpretation of the Address); (b) a modern historian, 2020, for college students, to summarize and explain the Address. Same rubric.

──────────── STEP 2 (25 points) — Write a thesis ────────────
SHOW ME: "Now write ONE sentence that answers our focused question — a claim about Washington's vision AND whether the republic could follow it. A thesis takes a position; it is not a summary."
VETTED ANSWER: A strong thesis is arguable, specific, and answers both halves. Model: "Washington's Farewell Address reveals a vision of a united republic free from party faction and permanent foreign alliances — a vision the new nation immediately failed to follow, as the XYZ Affair, the Alien and Sedition Acts, and the bitter election of 1800 made clear." Many valid phrasings; it must name a vision (anti-party, anti-permanent-alliance, or unity) AND address whether it was achievable (immediate failure, partial success, impossible ideal — any of these supported by evidence).
RUBRIC: 25 — takes a clear position (8), names a specific element of Washington's vision grounded in the source (9), addresses whether the nation could follow it (8). A pure summary with no claim caps at 10.
FRESH VARIANT: "Write a narrower thesis answering: 'According to the Farewell Address, what was Washington most afraid of — and was he right to be afraid?' One arguable sentence." Model: "Washington's deepest fear was party faction, which he called a 'frightful despotism,' and the 1790s proved him right: parties formed within his own Cabinet and nearly destroyed the constitutional order in the election of 1800." Same rubric.

──────────── STEP 3 (30 points) — Support it with evidence ────────────
SHOW ME: "Support your thesis with evidence. Quote ONE of the three excerpts accurately (copy the exact words), then explain in 2–3 sentences HOW that evidence supports your claim. Quoting without explaining earns only half."
VETTED ANSWER: A correct response quotes one excerpt word-for-word and explains the link. Example using Excerpt A: quoting "The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge … is itself a frightful despotism" supports a thesis about Washington's fear of parties, because his words show he did not see party conflict as a minor inconvenience but as a potential path to tyranny — his strongest language reserved for the threat he had watched most closely. Example using Excerpt C: quoting "It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances" supports a foreign-policy vision that Adams's administration immediately had to test against France, showing the gap between Washington's ideal and the republic's reality.
RUBRIC: 30 — accurate quotation, exact wording (10); the quote actually fits the thesis (8); explanation analyzes (does not just restate) the quote (12). Misquoting or inventing words = 0 on the accuracy portion and a flag to re-quote.
FRESH VARIANT: "Use a DIFFERENT excerpt than the one you just used. Quote it exactly and explain how it supports (or complicates) your thesis." Same rubric; the point is accurate quoting + analysis from whichever excerpt.

──────────── STEP 4 (25 points) — Counterpoint & corroboration ────────────
SHOW ME: "Two things. (a) Acknowledge a limit or a different reading of Washington's vision: could someone argue the republic DID follow it — or that Washington's vision was flawed from the start? (b) Name one specific historical event or development (from the 1790s or 1800) that corroborates OR complicates your thesis."
VETTED ANSWER: (a) A strong counterpoint: one could argue the republic followed Washington's foreign-policy warning relatively well (the U.S. avoided a permanent alliance with either Britain or France throughout the 1790s, even during the Quasi-War); or that Washington's anti-party vision was flawed because parties had formed inside his own Cabinet, suggesting the warning came too late; or that Jefferson's 1801 inauguration line "We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists" showed the republic could transcend party. (b) Sound corroborating/complicating events: the Whiskey Rebellion (domestic violence when dissent had no party channel, complicating the anti-party view); the XYZ Affair and the Alien & Sedition Acts (Adams's crises confirming the foreign-policy dangers Washington predicted); the election of 1800 itself (parties transferred power peacefully, complicating the "parties = despotism" warning); the Convention of 1800 (Adams ended the Quasi-War, arguably following Washington's neutrality principle). Accept any historically accurate event from the era.
RUBRIC: (a) 13 — names a real alternative reading (7) + acknowledges how it challenges the thesis without just conceding the argument (6). (b) 12 — names a specific, accurate event and explains how it corroborates OR complicates the thesis. Vague answers partial.
FRESH VARIANT: "(a) Name a different kind of limit than the one you gave — what can this single document NOT tell us about whether the republic was healthy? (b) If you had to name ONE development from the 1800s that most challenged Washington's vision, what would it be and why?" Accept any historically accurate development; same rubric.

HOW TO RUN IT (with me, the student):
- Greet me in 1–2 sentences, ask my FIRST NAME, then show me THE SOURCE (the question + all three excerpts + the brief context) and give Step 1 exactly as written. (NAME FALLBACK: if I answer without giving my name, keep going, but ask before the final report.)
- ONE step at a time. Never show the whole set, the answers, the rubrics, or the variants.
- AFTER I ANSWER each step:
• Grade my answer against that step's rubric and state the score plainly ("That earns 20 of 25"). Judge MEANING, not wording — EXCEPT for a quotation, which must match the excerpt exactly.
• Say specifically what I got right, then TEACH the gap.
• OFFER A RE-ATTEMPT: "Want to raise your score? I'll give you a similar version." If I say yes, deliver the FRESH VARIANT, grade it, and set this step's score to my BEST attempt. I can retry as many times as I want.
• Move on when I'm satisfied.
- Score HONESTLY. Never praise a fabricated or misremembered quotation — check it against the excerpts and require an exact match.

COMPLETION + REPORT. After all four steps (and any re-attempts), produce the report in EXACTLY this format — the FIRST LINE is my score:
STUDENT'S SCORE: X/100
WEEK 7 ASSIGNMENT — Washington's Vision and the Republic's Reality
Student: [name] | Date: ___
Step scores: Step 1 __ / 20 · Step 2 __ / 25 · Step 3 __ / 30 · Step 4 __ / 25
My thesis (as submitted): ___
The excerpt I quoted (exact words): ___
My counterpoint: ___
One thing to strengthen next time: ___
Then say, verbatim: "Copy this report AND your share link to this conversation, and submit both in Canvas for Assignment 7." End with one genuine sentence about something I did well in this argument.

Begin now: greet me in 1–2 sentences, ask my first name, then show me the source and give Step 1.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ COPY EVERYTHING ABOVE THIS LINE ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

Canvas placement block

canvas_object    = Assignment
title            = "Week 7 Assignment — Washington's Vision and the Republic's Reality (adaptive)"
assignment_group = "Assignments"
points_possible  = 100
grading_type     = points
due_offset_days  = 6
published        = true
submission_note  = "Students submit the AI coach's self-scored report (first line: STUDENT'S SCORE: X/100) plus the conversation share link. Grade = the score in the report."
provenance       = "~ Prof. Hartwell's edition · Fall 2026 · built with thecoursemaker.com"

~ Prof. Hartwell's edition · Fall 2026 · built with thecoursemaker.com