Using Artificial Intelligence
AI 101~ Prof. Quinn's edition · Fall 2026 · built with thecoursemaker.com
This is a complete, term-paced course — sixteen weeks, every component, generated and ready to import. It's the kind of edition an instructor owns: paced to a real calendar, editable in Canvas, your name on every page. Browse the whole thing below — click any piece to read it in full, then click back to return here.
Nothing here is locked behind a signup. The course is the proof.
Like what you see? Build your own.
Give The Course Maker your topic and term dates, approve the plan, and download a complete Canvas course like this one — paced to your calendar and owned by you. $59 founding this fall ($99 list).
Policies, schedule, and grading
Read the full course syllabus
Fictional sample for demonstration. Silver Oak University and Prof. Quinn are fictional, used to showcase thecoursemaker.com. No real institution, course, or person is implied or endorsed. Real companies, tools, and products are named factually as the subject matter.
| Course | Using Artificial Intelligence — Practical AI Fluency for Every Major · AI 101 |
| Institution | Silver Oak University · Department of Digital Studies |
| Term | Fall 2026 · 16 weeks (Aug 31 – Dec 18) |
| Units | 3 |
| Modality | In-person (two 75-minute sessions/week); laptop required |
| Prerequisite | None — open to all majors |
| Instructor | Prof. Quinn |
| Office hours | Posted on the course homepage; drop-in and by appointment |
| Contact | Through the course messaging tool (replies within 1 business day) |
Course Description
Artificial intelligence is becoming a baseline workforce skill in every field, and this course teaches you how to use it well — effectively, critically, and responsibly. It is a practical, hands-on, build-things course, not a computer-science or machine-learning course: there is no coding or math prerequisite, and you do not need any technical background. You need curiosity and a willingness to question your own assumptions — and the AI's.
We move along a deliberate arc: the right mindset → how AI actually works (and where it fails) → prompting in real depth → simulations → working across voice, audio, images and documents → choosing the right tool → verifying AI output → four hands-on weeks building real automations in Claude Cowork → privacy, ethics, and the future of work, finishing with a capstone where you design, build, and document an AI-powered workflow that solves a real problem in your own academic or work life.
A through-line runs across every single week: the tool drafts, you judge. AI is confidently wrong often enough that verifying its output is a core skill, not an afterthought — so every week includes a moment where you deliberately catch the AI's mistakes (a made-up fact, a fake citation, sycophantic praise, a flawed plan, the wrong tool for the job) and improve on them. That habit is the course.
A note on what this course is not. It is not a "ChatGPT tips" listicle, and it is not a doom-or-hype seminar about AI and society. It is a skills course: by the end you will be measurably better at getting high-quality, well-verified work out of AI tools — and at knowing when not to trust them.
Learning Objectives
By the end of the course, you will be able to:
- Explain what generative AI and large language models are, how they work at a conceptual level (next-token prediction, training, tokens, the context window), and their core capabilities and limits — including why AI can be "confidently wrong."
- Apply effective prompting — conversation and asking for guidance, providing content, emphasis, meta-prompting, the structured-prompt components, examples (zero/one/few-shot), and simulations — to get high-quality results from an AI assistant.
- Work across modalities (text, voice, audio, images, documents) and choose the right AI tool for a given job from the current tool landscape.
- Critically evaluate and verify AI output — recognize hallucination, sycophancy, and bias, and run a reliable verification workflow.
- Use Claude Cowork to build agentic workflows — projects, connected folders and file read/write, tasks, skills, connectors, and live artifacts.
- Automate real tasks with scheduled tasks and dispatch, and operate cross-app workflows (computer use, Claude in Chrome, Claude in Excel) — using agentic tools safely.
- Apply responsible-AI practices — data privacy, terms of service, content ownership / IP, bias and fairness, and academic & professional integrity — and build a personal ethical framework for the AI age.
- Integrate AI into real academic and work tasks, adapt as tools evolve, and design, build, document, and verify an end-to-end AI-powered workflow that solves a genuine problem.
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
- SLO A — AI fluency & prompt craft. Produce high-quality, well-verified results with AI across modalities and tools — through strong prompting, tool selection, and agentic workflows.
- SLO B — Responsible & critical AI use. Evaluate, verify, and use AI ethically and safely — catching hallucination and sycophancy, protecting privacy and IP, and acting with integrity.
Required Materials
There is no required textbook, and you will pay nothing for course materials. Readings, videos, and tool references are delivered as links to external resources posted in each weekly module. You will need:
- A laptop with a web browser and internet access (bring it to every session).
- A free account on at least one approved AI assistant — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or Copilot (the free tier of any is sufficient for most of the course).
- Claude Cowork desktop, which is required for Weeks 11–14 and the capstone (the hands-on automation weeks). Setup is walked through in Week 11; the free/trial access available at that time is sufficient for the coursework.
- A free recording/transcription app for Week 7 (your phone's voice recorder plus a free transcription tool is fine).
You do not need to pay for any premium tier to complete the course, and you do not need any prior experience with these tools.
Grading
Your course grade is the weighted total of the groups below. Weights sum to 100%.
| Assignment group | Weight | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Lecture tutorials | 5% | 14 weekly AI-tutor tutorials; submit the conversation share link |
| Quizzes | 10% | 14 quizzes (every instructional week — W1–7, 9–15) |
| Practice exercises | 0% | Ungraded; weekly, for mastery practice |
| AI Build Studios | 15% | 14 weekly hands-on build activities (every instructional week) |
| Assignments | 15% | 14 assignments (every instructional week — W1–7, 9–15) |
| Discussions | 10% | 15 discussions (every week except W16; W8 is the midterm debrief) |
| Midterm | 20% | Week 8 (cumulative, Weeks 1–7) |
| Final | 25% | Week 16 (cumulative; paired with the capstone) |
| Total | 100% |
Attendance is tracked at every session but is not weighted (see the Attendance Policy).
Per-item points: quizzes 10 · discussions 20 · assignments 100 · AI Build Studios 50 · midterm & final 100 each.
Letter-Grade Scale
| Grade | Range |
|---|---|
| A | 90–100% |
| B | 80–89.9% |
| C | 70–79.9% |
| D | 60–69.9% |
| F | below 60% |
Late & Make-Up Policy
- Late penalty: 10% per day. Submitted work loses 10 percentage points of its earned score for each day (or part of a day) it is late.
- Quizzes, the Midterm, and the Final are time-bound. Make-ups are arranged only for documented emergencies — contact Prof. Quinn as early as possible, ideally before the due date.
- AI Build Studios build on the week's skill and are best done the same week; the automation Studios (W11–14) depend on having Claude Cowork set up, so start early.
- Practice exercises are ungraded and exist for your benefit; the late penalty does not apply to them.
- If something serious is getting in the way of your work, reach out early. It is almost always easier to arrange support before a deadline than to repair a grade after it.
AI-Use Policy
This course is unusual, and the policy is deliberately the reverse of most courses: AI is the subject, so you are required to use it on your coursework — and it is banned on the closed assessments. Read this carefully, because the meta-design is the point.
The core idea
You cannot become fluent with AI without using it constantly, and you cannot prove you understand the material if an AI takes your quiz for you. So the course splits cleanly:
- AI is required (and the whole point) on: the Lecture Tutorials, Discussions, Assignments, Practice Exercises, and the weekly AI Build Studios. These are where you build skill by working with AI — and, crucially, by catching and correcting its mistakes.
- AI is not permitted on: the Quizzes, the Midterm, and the Final. These are built from auto-gradable items and exist to confirm that you personally understand the concepts, terminology, capabilities and limits, prompting principles, tool choices, and ethics — the things you'll need in your head when the AI isn't there or isn't trustworthy.
Why you can't just paste AI output for credit
The Studios and assignments are engineered so that raw AI output won't earn the grade. Each one requires you to use the AI, then verify, critique, and improve what it produced — and the rubric awards points for your judgment, verification, and iteration, not for the AI's first draft. A student who pastes an unchecked answer will miss exactly the points the activity is designed to measure.
Approved tools
Use one of these approved AI assistants: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or Copilot (free tiers are fine). The automation weeks (W11–14) and the capstone additionally require Claude Cowork desktop.
How AI shows up in the adaptive activities
Your Lecture Tutorials, Discussions, and Assignments are adaptive-learning activities you complete with an assistant, then submit the conversation share link plus the AI's summary or self-scored report. The share link is part of your submission — treat the conversation as your work, keep it on-topic, and do your own thinking. The weekly AI Build Studio is submitted as your build + your AI-critique write-up (what the AI got wrong and how you fixed it).
Integrity
Using AI as described here is encouraged and fully consistent with the integrity standard below. The violations are fabricating or doctoring a chat you submit, and using AI on the closed assessments (Quizzes, Midterm, Final). When in doubt, ask before you submit.
Attendance Policy
This is an in-person course built around live demonstrations, hands-on building, and think-pair-share — much of the learning happens in the room.
- Attendance is tracked at every session. It is not part of your weighted grade, but a strong attendance record is expected, and the hands-on build sessions are hard to reconstruct alone — consistent absence will show in your performance.
- Bring your laptop, arrive on time, and engage professionally with your classmates and instructor.
- If you must miss a session, notify Prof. Quinn in advance when possible and review the module materials to catch up. You remain responsible for any content, announcements, and due dates from a missed class.
Academic Integrity
You are expected to do your own work and to represent it honestly. In this course, "your own work" includes working with AI where the activity calls for it — but it never includes fabricating a chat transcript, misrepresenting AI output as your own unverified reasoning on the closed assessments, or using AI where it is prohibited (the Quizzes, Midterm, and Final). Cheating, plagiarism, and submitting another's work — human or AI — as your own where it is not permitted are violations of academic integrity and will be handled according to university policy. When in doubt about what is allowed, ask first. Holding to this standard is what makes your grade — and your degree — mean something.
Accessibility: Silver Oak University is committed to equal access. Students who need accommodations should contact the campus disability services office to arrange them; notify Prof. Quinn early in the term so supports can be in place. (Placeholder — institutions should insert their official accessibility, Title IX, and integrity statements here.)
Course Schedule — Fall 2026 (16 Weeks)
Term runs Aug 31 – Dec 18. Campus holidays: Labor Day (Sep 7), Veterans Day (Nov 11), Thanksgiving (Nov 26–27). Week 16 is reserved for finals. Dates are the Monday of each week.
| Wk | Week of | Focus | Key assessments due |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aug 31 | Welcome to the AI Revolution — Mindset & Mental Models | Quiz 1; Discussion 1; Assignment 1; Studio 1 |
| 2 | Sep 7 | How AI Actually Works & Its Limits (Labor Day, Sep 7) | Quiz 2; Discussion 2; Assignment 2; Studio 2 |
| 3 | Sep 14 | Prompting I — Conversation, Content & Emphasis | Quiz 3; Discussion 3; Assignment 3; Studio 3 |
| 4 | Sep 21 | Prompting II — Meta-Prompting & Structured Prompts | Quiz 4; Discussion 4; Assignment 4; Studio 4 |
| 5 | Sep 28 | Prompting III — Examples, Structure & Control | Quiz 5; Discussion 5; Assignment 5; Studio 5 |
| 6 | Oct 5 | Simulations & Reusable Prompts | Quiz 6; Discussion 6; Assignment 6; Studio 6 |
| 7 | Oct 12 | Multimodal AI — Voice, Audio, Images & Documents | Quiz 7; Discussion 7; Assignment 7; Studio 7 |
| 8 | Oct 19 | Midterm Review & Exam | Midterm; Discussion 8 |
| 9 | Oct 26 | The AI Tool Landscape — Choosing the Right Tool | Quiz 9; Discussion 9; Assignment 9; Studio 9 |
| 10 | Nov 2 | Verification, Hallucination & Critical Thinking | Quiz 10; Discussion 10; Assignment 10; Studio 10 |
| 11 | Nov 9 | Claude Cowork I — Projects, Files & the Desktop (Veterans Day, Nov 11) | Quiz 11; Discussion 11; Assignment 11; Studio 11 |
| 12 | Nov 16 | Claude Cowork II — Skills, Connectors & Artifacts | Quiz 12; Discussion 12; Assignment 12; Studio 12 |
| 13 | Nov 23 | Claude Cowork III — Scheduled Tasks, Dispatch & Automation (Thanksgiving, Nov 26–27) | Quiz 13; Discussion 13; Assignment 13; Studio 13 |
| 14 | Nov 30 | Claude Cowork IV — Computer Use, Chrome, Excel & Workflows | Quiz 14; Discussion 14; Assignment 14; Studio 14 |
| 15 | Dec 7 | AI, Ethics, Privacy & the Future of Work | Quiz 15; Discussion 15; Assignment 15; Studio 15 |
| 16 | Dec 14 | Final Review & Exam (+ Capstone) | Final; Capstone |
Practice exercises and a Lecture Tutorial are part of every week's module; the table lists the graded touchpoints. Exam weeks (8 & 16) carry no weekly Studio. The schedule may be adjusted with advance notice; changes will be announced in the course.
Assignment groups & weights
Configured in the export — the gradebook is set the moment the course is imported.
| Assignment group | Weight | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Lecture tutorials | 5% | |
| Quizzes | 10% | |
| Practice exercises | 0% | Not weighted |
| AI Build Studios | 15% | |
| Assignments | 15% | |
| Discussions | 10% | |
| Attendance | 0% | Not weighted |
| Midterm | 20% | |
| Final | 25% | |
| Late policy | 10%/day | Per day late |
| Total | 100% | Letter Standard |
What students will be able to do
Explain what generative AI and large language models are, how they work at a conceptual level (next-token prediction, training, tokens, the context window), and their core capabilities and limits — including why AI can be 'confidently wrong.'
Apply effective prompting — conversation and asking for guidance, providing content, emphasis (Markdown/XML/capitalization), meta-prompting, the structured-prompt components, examples (zero/one/few-shot), and simulations — to get high-quality results from an AI assistant.
Work across modalities (text, voice, audio, images, documents) and choose the right AI tool for a given job from the current tool landscape.
Critically evaluate and verify AI output — recognize hallucination, sycophancy, and bias, and run a reliable verification workflow (ask for and check sources, cross-check in a second model, have the AI critique itself).
Use Claude Cowork to build agentic workflows — projects, connected folders and file read/write, tasks, skills, connectors (MCP), and live artifacts.
Automate real tasks with scheduled tasks and dispatch, and operate cross-app workflows (computer use, Claude in Chrome, Claude in Excel) — using agentic tools safely (approvals, link safety, never moving money/executing trades on your behalf).
Apply responsible-AI practices — data privacy and what not to paste, terms of service and data retention, content ownership / IP, bias and fairness, and academic & professional integrity — and build a personal ethical framework for the AI age.
Integrate AI into real academic and work tasks, adapt as tools evolve, and design, build, document, and verify an end-to-end AI-powered workflow that solves a genuine problem.
AI fluency & prompt craft. Produce high-quality, well-verified results with AI across modalities and tools — through strong prompting, tool selection, and agentic workflows.
Responsible & critical AI use. Evaluate, verify, and use AI ethically and safely — catching hallucination and sycophancy, protecting privacy and IP, and acting with integrity.
About this sample — read this first
This sample deliberately includes every possible component, every week, so you can see the full range of what The Course Maker generates — lecture outline, AI-tutor tutorial, practice, slides, quiz, discussion, readings, assignment, a module overview, and a weekly AI Build Studio, plus the midterm and final bundles. Most real courses are lighter than this. At setup you choose what to include, and you can spread discussions, quizzes, and assignments across alternating weeks to fit your course and your pace. (The syllabus above shows one such lighter, realistic cadence; the outline below shows the full kitchen sink.) You choose; you own it.
Discussions & assignments: traditional or adaptive
Every discussion and every assignment can be generated in one of two modes — your choice at setup. Same learning objectives and the same rubric either way; what changes is how the work happens.
The familiar way
The course posts a prompt or a problem set. The student does the work themselves and submits it, and the instructor grades it against the included rubric. No AI required.
Work it through with an approved chatbot
The student does the work in a guided conversation with their own approved chatbot — Gemini, Claude, or ChatGPT — using a copy-paste prompt the course provides. For a discussion, the AI is a Socratic partner that challenges their thinking and never writes the post; the student posts a short summary plus a link to the chat. For an assignment, the AI is a coach and grader: it gives problems one at a time, scores each against the embedded rubric, teaches through mistakes, and lets the student retry a fresh variant to raise their score — then outputs a self-scored report (first line STUDENT'S SCORE: X/100) submitted with the chat link.
This sample course is set to adaptive — the traditional version of any item is one setting away. Open any week's discussion or assignment to see both side by side.
Every week, every component
Each week is a heading; every component under it links to the full artifact. Exam weeks carry the midterm/final bundle instead of the weekly quiz, tutorial, practice, and assignment.