Lecture: Revision & Style
Lecture script · about 15–20 minutes spoken · Week 13
Opening
Think of a nurse rewriting a shift-change note so the next nurse sees the one urgent fact first. Think of an engineer trimming a project update before it goes to a client. Think of a club officer cutting a long announcement down to what members need. All three run the same two passes. First they fix what the message says. Then they make every sentence earn its place.
Here's where we are. In Week 1 you met the difference between revision and editing in one sentence each. In Week 3 you built the running draft's body paragraph, first weak and then revised. In Week 4 you learned the reverse outline. And last week, in Week 12, you assembled the whole running draft, from thesis to works cited. This week you treat that draft the way experienced writers treat theirs. Next week, in Week 14, the local pass goes one level closer, to the errors at the edges of sentences.
I'll take you through ten moves, and after each one I'll stop and ask you something. Let's start with the two kinds of help a draft can need.
1. Separate global revision from local editing
Picture a kitchen remodel. If the sink is on the wrong wall, you move the plumbing before you pick a faucet. Pick the faucet first and the plumber rips it out. Drafts work the same way.
Global revision is re-seeing a draft as a whole by working on its thesis, structure, argument, and evidence, which can mean moving paragraphs, cutting sections, or rewriting the thesis. Local editing is work on a draft's sentences and surface, such as wording, length, rhythm, and punctuation, done after the global pass so that no effort goes into sentences that are about to be cut. And the two-pass rule is the habit of doing them separately, with the big pass first.
Here's the test I use. If a change alters what the essay says, or the order it says it in, it's global. If it alters how one sentence sounds, it's local. Rewriting the thesis is global. Moving the counterargument is global. Swapping "due to the fact that" for "because" is local.
Pause and try this. You cut a whole paragraph that wanders away from your claim. Is that global revision or local editing?
Ask whether the change touches what the essay contains.
Here's the answer. It's global revision. Cutting a paragraph changes what the essay contains, not how one sentence sounds.
2. Meet the study behind the rule
Ask a friend what they did when they revised a paper, and you'll often hear a list of small fixes. A better word here, a comma there. That answer is common enough that a researcher studied it.
Sommers, in 1980, published "Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers" in College Composition and Communication. She reported that the student writers she studied tended to treat revision as rewording, one word at a time. The experienced writers re-saw the whole piece. They asked what the draft was arguing and whether its parts served that argument.
An honest caveat: Sommers studied particular groups of writers, and her finding describes a tendency, not a law. It doesn't say word choice never matters. What it gives you is a warning. If every change you make is a word swap, you've edited, but you may not have revised.
Pause and try this. A writer changes "good" to "excellent" and "job" to "position" throughout a cover letter. Which kind of reviser from the study does that sound like?
Think about whether the letter's argument changed at all.
Here's the answer. It sounds like the student writers Sommers described. The words changed, but nothing about what the letter argues was re-seen.
3. Revisit the running draft's paragraph
You've known the running draft's body paragraph since Week 3. Let's look at it again as an example of global revision.
The weak version opens, "Phones are a problem in lectures." Then it says everyone has one, the writer checks theirs a lot, a roommate's lecture hall has bad Wi-Fi, and some students take notes on their phones. It ends, "So phones should be banned." That's 6 sentences and 36 words.
The revised version opens with a claim: "The strongest reason for a phone-free default is that the benefit is not spread evenly." It reports that research on schools that banned phones found the gain in exam results concentrated among the lowest-achieving students. Then it explains why that pattern matters for a policy decision, and it links to the policy's exception. That's 4 sentences and 90 words.
Here's what changed. The complaint became a claim. The Wi-Fi sentence, which broke unity, was cut. Evidence and explanation were added. And of the 6 old sentences, none survived. The paragraph grew by 54 words.
Pause and try this. The revision made the paragraph longer, not shorter. Does that mean it wasn't real revision?
Think about what the weak paragraph was missing.
Here's the answer. No, it was real revision. The weak paragraph lacked evidence and explanation, so re-seeing it meant adding, and shortening is a local move that comes later.
4. Use the reverse outline
From street level, a city is storefronts. From a plane, you see two highways that never connect. A reverse outline is the view from the plane.
A reverse outline works backward from a finished draft. Beside each paragraph you note what it says, then what job it does for the argument. Then you read only the notes.
Let's do it on the running draft. Its thesis says lecture sections should be phone-free by default, with a stated exception, because the benefit falls hardest on the students who struggle most and the cost to everyone else is small. Notice that the thesis makes two promises: the benefit, and the small cost. Now the "does" notes for the five paragraphs. The first introduces the problem and states the thesis. The second sets the context with the sources in conversation. The third argues the first promise. The fourth steel-mans the objection and rebuts it. The fifth closes the case.
Pause and try this. Read those five notes against the two promises. What's missing?
Match each promise to a paragraph.
Here's the answer. The second promise, that the cost is small, has no paragraph of its own. It shows up only in passing, so the global move is to give it a body paragraph before the counterargument, taking the draft from five paragraphs to six.
No amount of sentence polishing would have found that. The problem was in the shape.
5. Cut deadwood, not ideas
Packing for a trip with a small bag teaches you fast. The third pair of shoes stays home. Nothing you need is left behind, only what was taking up room.
Concision is writing in which every word earns its place. It aims at the strongest wording, which is not always the shortest. The words that do no work are called deadwood, and they come in four kinds. Inflated phrases say "due to the fact that" for "because". Redundancy says "each and every". Empty intensifiers are words like "very" and "really". And buried verbs hide an action in a noun, like "made a decision" for "decided".
The tradition is old. Strunk, in 1918, made Rule 13 of The Elements of Style "Omit needless words". Orwell, in "Politics and the English Language" in 1946, wrote, "If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out".
Here's the course's concision pair. Before: "Due to the fact that the survey was very short, there were many students who completed it." That's 17 words. After: "Because the survey was short, many students completed it." That's 9. The inflated phrase saved 4 words, "very" saved 1, and the padded "there were many students who" saved 3. That's 8 words cut, and the meaning is intact.
Pause and try this. "The committee made a decision to hold a vote on the proposal." Which kind of deadwood is hiding in "made a decision"?
Look for an action that turned into a noun.
Here's the answer. It's a buried verb. "Decision" hides "decide", so the sentence becomes "The committee decided to vote on the proposal", and 12 words drop to 8.
6. Try the 25 percent challenge
A runner who wants to get faster does drills that are harder than a race. Nobody scores the drills. They train the legs.
The 25 percent challenge is a practice target in which a writer tries to cut about a quarter of a paragraph's words without losing a single claim. It trains the eye for deadwood, and it's never scored.
Here's a hiking club's announcement. It opens, "At this point in time, the hiking club has made a decision to hold its first hike of the season at the north trailhead." It says each and every member is invited, and that the trail is really steep, so bring water. That's 40 words. Cut "At this point in time", which is 5 words. Turn "has made a decision" into "has decided", saving 2. Turn "each and every" into "every", saving 2. Drop "really", saving 1. That's 10 words, which is a quarter of 40, and you're left with 30.
Pause and try this. After those cuts, has the announcement lost any claim?
Check who, what, where, who's invited, and the warning.
Here's the answer. No claim is lost. Every cut came from deadwood, so all five pieces of information survive.
And if a paragraph can't lose a quarter without losing an idea, stop short. The target is practice.
7. Vary the sentences
Listen to someone who talks only in short bursts. "I went out. It was cold. I came back." After a minute it sounds like a telegram. Good prose mixes short and long.
Sentence variety is a deliberate mix of sentence lengths and sentence openings. The main tool is sentence combining, by coordination, joining equal ideas with a word like "and" or "but", or by subordination, making one idea depend on another with a word like "when" or "although".
Here's a storm report with five choppy sentences, every one starting with "The". The storm reached the coast at dawn. The wind tore the roofs off the warehouses. The river rose over its banks. The main road closed. The shelters filled by noon. That's 30 words. Now combine. "When the storm reached the coast at dawn, the wind tore the roofs off the warehouses." That's subordination. "The river rose over its banks, and the main road closed." That's coordination. Then keep the short one: "The shelters filled by noon." Three sentences, 32 words. It got two words longer, and it reads better.
Two commas travel with combining. When the dependent part comes first, a comma marks where the main part begins. When "and" or "but" joins two complete sentences, a comma goes before it.
Pause and try this. "The claim is clear, but the evidence is thin." Was that built by coordination or subordination?
Look at the word that joins the two halves.
Here's the answer. Coordination. "But" joins two ideas of equal weight, and the comma sits before it.
8. Put the weight where it belongs
When you tell a joke, the punch line goes last. Sentences work the same way.
Emphasis is the weight a sentence gives an idea. It falls most strongly on the end of the sentence and on the main clause, the part that could stand alone as a complete sentence.
Take that same sentence. "The claim is clear, but the evidence is thin." It ends on the weakness. Flip it: "The evidence is thin, but the claim is clear." Now it ends on the strength. Or subordinate: "Although the evidence is thin, the claim is clear." The strength now sits in the main clause and at the end.
Pause and try this. You're conceding a weak point in a counterargument and want the reader to remember your strength. Which of the three versions do you want?
Ask where the weight lands.
Here's the answer. The "Although" version. It admits the weakness in the dependent part and puts the strength in the main clause, at the end.
9. Choose active or passive on purpose
"My brother broke the window" names who did it. "The window was broken" doesn't. Both are correct English.
In the active voice, the doer comes first and acts: "The committee approved the proposal." In the passive voice, the receiver comes first and the doer comes later or drops out: "The proposal was approved by the committee," or "The proposal was approved." Passive is correct grammar, and it's the right choice when the doer is unknown, beside the point, or deliberately kept in the background.
A lab sentence like "The samples were weighed twice" is a good passive. The reader needs to know what happened to the samples, not who held the scale. But in an argument, the doer usually matters. "The proposal was approved" lets the committee off the hook.
Pause and try this. A writer's grammar checker flags "The samples were weighed twice" as passive. Should the writer change it?
Ask whether the reader needs the doer.
Here's the answer. No. The passive is correct, and the doer is beside the point in a methods sentence, so it's the right choice.
10. Check the machine
Chatbots are quick at making text shorter. The danger is that shorter and same claim are two different things.
Voice-erasing over-editing is editing, often by a chatbot, that flattens a writer's own phrasing into generic wording or quietly changes the writer's claim while making a passage shorter or smoother.
Here's an illustration. You ask a chatbot to tighten the running draft's 90-word revised paragraph. It hands back 14 words: "Phone bans raise grades for struggling students, so colleges should ban phones in lectures." That's 76 words gone. Now compare. A phone-free default with an exception became a ban, the opposite of the draft's own rebuttal. A gain concentrated among the lowest-achieving students became grades raised. One college became all colleges. And the writer's phrase "the students with the least slack" vanished.
The tool drafts, and the writer judges.
Pause and try this. The chatbot's version is much shorter. Why does the cut still fail?
Compare the claim before and after.
Here's the answer. It changed the claim. Concision cuts deadwood, not ideas, so you keep your original paragraph.
Closing
Let me pull it together. Revise globally first, then edit locally. Sommers found that student writers tended to reword while experienced writers re-saw the whole. The running draft's paragraph shows revision as re-seeing, not shrinking. A reverse outline's "does" notes reveal missing, repeated, or misplaced paragraphs. Cut deadwood, not ideas. Use the 25 percent challenge as a drill. Mix your sentence lengths by combining. Put the weight at the end and in the main clause. Choose active or passive on purpose. And check every chatbot cut for a changed claim.
Next in this module come the slide deck, the Readings and Resources page, the lecture tutorial, the practice set, and the quiz. Next week, in Week 14, Editing: Grammar, Mechanics & Common Errors, you'll take the local pass down to the clause.
Built with The Course Maker · samples.thecoursemaker.com