Week 15 Discussion — Profit, Cash, or the Story Between? — Traditional alternative (no AI)

Instructors: publish this instead of the adaptive version if you prefer, and unpublish or delete the adaptive one.

Hook

In Year 2 the bicycle shop (illustrative) earned net income of $69,000. Its operations brought in $74,000 of cash, and its total cash grew by $49,000, from $22,000 to $71,000. Back in Month 1, the same shop earned $1,400 while its operations used $400 of cash, and its current ratio was about 12.9 against 2.5 at the end of Year 2. This week you met the statement of cash flows and its three sections, the indirect method, four ratios, a public company's 10‑K, and the shop's whole story.

Your discussion question — choose Option A or Option B; they carry the same weight and the same rubric, and you say which you picked.

Option A: Imagine you are a lender deciding whether to renew the shop's note. Which tells you more about the shop's Year 2: its $69,000 of net income or its $74,000 of net cash provided by operating activities? Argue for one, and say what the other still tells you. Use the indirect method, depreciation, and the changes in current operating assets and liabilities in your answer.

Option B: The shop's current ratio went from about 12.9 at the end of Month 1 to 2.5 at the end of Year 2. Should a reader take that change as a warning, as a sign of a busier shop, or as neither until they know more? Argue your view using the statement of cash flows, the current ratio, and at least one other ratio from this week.

There is no single right answer. The rules are not in question here: depreciation is added back because it used no cash, a dividend paid is a financing activity, the statement ties to the $71,000 of cash, and a ratio is never good or bad on its own. What is open is what each figure tells a reader, and how much a reader can conclude from it.

Expectations

Activity format: one initial post followed by two substantive peer replies. Plan on about 45 minutes across the two deadlines; your instructor sets both due dates in Canvas.

Working on your own: this version of the discussion is written entirely from your own reasoning, in your own words.

Your initial post — by the first due date (early in the module week):

• Say which option you chose.
• For Option A, argue whether the $69,000 of net income or the $74,000 of operating cash tells a lender more, and say what the other still tells, using the indirect method, depreciation, and the changes in current operating assets and liabilities; for Option B, argue how a reader should take the change in the current ratio from about 12.9 to 2.5, using the statement of cash flows, the current ratio, and at least one other ratio.
• Keep the documented rules plain: depreciation is added back because it used no cash, a dividend paid is a financing activity, and a ratio is never good or bad on its own. Keep to the shop's illustrative figures, state no real company's figures, and give no tax or investment advice.
• Give your judgment, with a reason.
• Length: roughly 150–250 words if written. You may instead record your post as audio or video (about two minutes) and attach a transcript; both forms are scored by the same rubric.

Your replies — by the second due date (the end of the module week):

• Reply substantively to at least two classmates.
• A substantive reply does more than agree: offer the strongest case for the other view, point out a term or figure a classmate misstated, or name a line of the statement of cash flows that would test their claim. "Nice point!" on its own does not count.

What a strong post looks like:

I chose Option A. I think the $74,000 of operating cash tells a lender more, because the note is repaid in cash, not in net income. The indirect method shows why the two differ: the shop added back $12,000 of depreciation that used no cash, but it also tied up $3,000 in receivables and $5,000 in inventory. Still, net income matters, because one year's operating cash can swing with a single large payable, which is the strongest case for the other view.

Notice how it uses the indirect method and current operating assets with their meanings, ties each claim to the shop's figures, and admits the best case against its own view. That is the bar.

Participation rubric

This discussion is worth 10 points. The three criteria below look at your initial post and your peer replies.

Post early if you can — the best threads happen when people have time to reply before the second due date.

Built with The Course Maker · samples.thecoursemaker.com