Week 2 Discussion — How Much Should the Market Decide? — Traditional alternative (no AI)
Instructors: publish this instead of the adaptive version if you prefer, and unpublish or delete the adaptive one.
Hook
Every economy has to settle who owns and who decides, and every market has to settle on a price. This week you learned that nearly every country runs a mixed economy, and that a price below equilibrium leaves a shortage while a higher price can clear it. Neither fact tells you what a community should choose.
Your discussion question — choose Option A or Option B; they carry the same weight and the same rubric, and you say which you picked.
Option A: An illustrative mid-sized city must choose how to run its bus service. Under one plan, the city owns the buses and sets the routes and fares. Under the other, private companies compete for riders, and the city sets the safety rules. Which plan would you choose, and why? Name the stakeholders each plan helps and the ones it asks to give something up, and say what the strongest case for the other plan is.
Option B: On the illustrative festival weekend at the farmers' market, a 5-dollar price for strawberries leaves a shortage of 200 pints. One grower wants to raise the price to 6 dollars, the new equilibrium, so the berries go to the shoppers willing to pay most. Another wants to keep 5 dollars and sell first come, first served, even though some shoppers leave with nothing. Which would you choose, and why? Name the stakeholders each choice helps and the ones it leaves out, and say what the strongest case for the other choice is.
There is no single right answer. Two people can agree on every fact in the case and still choose differently, because the choice rests on how they weigh speed, fairness, choice, and cost. Pick the option you actually care about, and make your case.
Expectations
Activity format: one initial post followed by two substantive peer replies. Plan on about 45 minutes across the two deadlines; your instructor sets both due dates in Canvas.
Your initial post — by the first due date (early in the module week):
- Say which option you chose.
- For Option A, choose a bus plan, describe it by who owns and who decides, and name the stakeholders it helps and the ones it asks to give something up; for Option B, choose the 6-dollar price or the 5-dollar first-come sale, and name the stakeholders each choice helps and the ones it leaves out.
- Use at least two of this week's terms (economic system, mixed economy, equilibrium, shortage) correctly.
- State the strongest case for a view you do not hold, in one or two sentences.
- Length: roughly 150–250 words if written. You may instead record your post as audio or video (about two minutes) and attach a transcript; both forms are scored by the same rubric.
Your replies — by the second due date (the end of the module week):
- Reply substantively to at least two classmates.
- A substantive reply does more than agree: name a stakeholder the poster left out, show where a post reads the shortage as growers running out rather than a price below equilibrium, or make the strongest fair case for the plan or price the poster rejected. "Good post!" on its own does not count.
What a strong post looks like:
I chose Option B and would keep the 5-dollar price for the festival weekend. Regular shoppers, the customers who come every week, keep a price they trust, and the growers keep their goodwill with them. The shoppers who arrive late are left out, and the growers give up the extra money a 6-dollar price would bring. The strongest case for 6 dollars is that it ends the 200-pint shortage, so nobody waits in a line for berries that run out. That is a judgment about fairness versus speed, not a disagreement about the schedule.
Notice how it names specific groups, says who gains and who is left out, and states a fair case for the other side without calling it wrong. That is the bar.
Participation rubric
This discussion is worth 10 points. The three criteria below look at your initial post and your peer replies.
| Criterion | Full credit | Partial credit | No credit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality of the initial post (4 pts) | A clear choice on the bus plan or the strawberry price, with named stakeholders, a reason for the weighing, and a fair statement of another view | A position is present, but the stakeholders are vague or the weighing is asserted without a reason | Missing, off-topic, or no reasoning about the choice |
| Use of course concepts (3 pts) | Uses economic system, mixed economy, equilibrium, and shortage precisely, with no shortage read as sellers running out | Uses a term loosely, or treats one plan as a pure system with no mix | No course terms, or used incorrectly |
| Engagement with peers (3 pts) | Two or more substantive replies that extend or challenge a classmate's reasoning | One substantive reply, or replies that only agree | No replies, or "I agree" with nothing added |
Post early if you can — the best threads happen when people have time to reply before the second due date.
Built with The Course Maker · samples.thecoursemaker.com