Week 7 Discussion — Open at 4 Dollars or Hold at 5? — Traditional alternative (no AI)

Instructors: publish this instead of the adaptive version if you prefer, and unpublish or delete the adaptive one.

Hook

Every price is a bet about people: who the buyers are, how strongly they react to a price, and how many sales it takes to cover the costs. This week you learned that a target market is the group of buyers a business chooses to serve, that the break-even point is fixed costs divided by what each sale leaves over, and that a lower launch price raises the break-even because each sale contributes less. None of those ideas makes a real choice for you.

Your discussion question — choose Option A or Option B; they carry the same weight and the same rubric, and you say which you picked.

Option A: The illustrative coffee cart sells drinks at 5 dollars, each drink has a variable cost of 2 dollars, and its fixed costs are 36,000 dollars a year, so it breaks even at 12,000 drinks a year, about 48 a day. A chain café has opened nearby. The owner is weighing a 4-dollar penetration price instead, which would raise the break-even to 18,000 drinks a year. Should the cart charge 4 dollars or hold at 5? Take a side, name the stakeholders who gain and who give something up, and state the strongest case for the choice you did not make.

Option B: An illustrative community gym can afford to add one new class. It can build the class for retirees who want a social, low-impact workout at midday, or for early-shift workers who want a fast workout before work. Which target market should the gym choose? Take a side, name the segmentation base that defines your group, name who gains and who gives something up, and state the strongest case for the choice you did not make.

There is no single right answer. Two people can agree on every number in the case and still choose differently, because the choice rests on how they judge buyers' reaction to a price and how they weigh the owner, the staff, the regular customers, and the people the business does not choose to serve. The break-even figures are facts about an illustrative case; whether a business should act on them is a judgment, and nothing here is advice for pricing any real business. Pick the option you actually care about, and make your case.

Expectations

Activity format: one initial post followed by two substantive peer replies. Plan on about 45 minutes across the two deadlines; your instructor sets both due dates in Canvas.

Your initial post — by the first due date (early in the module week):

• Say which option you chose.
• For Option A, say whether the cart should charge 4 dollars or hold at 5, use the cart's break-even figures, and name the stakeholders who gain and who give something up; for Option B, say which group the gym should target, name the segmentation base that defines it, and name who gains and who gives something up.
• Use at least two of this week's terms (target market, segmentation, break-even point, penetration pricing, price sensitivity) correctly.
• State the strongest case for a view you do not hold, in one or two sentences.
• Length: roughly 150–250 words if written. You may instead record your post as audio or video (about two minutes) and attach a transcript; both forms are scored by the same rubric.

Your replies — by the second due date (the end of the module week):

• Reply substantively to at least two classmates.
• A substantive reply does more than agree: name a stakeholder the poster left out, show where a post assumes a lower price lowers the break-even or mixes up a figure, or make the strongest fair case for the choice the poster rejected. "Good post!" on its own does not count.

What a strong post looks like:

I chose Option A and think the cart should hold at 5 dollars. At 5 dollars each drink leaves 3 dollars toward the 36,000 dollars of fixed costs, so the cart breaks even at 12,000 drinks a year. At 4 dollars each drink leaves only 2, so the break-even rises to 18,000. Office workers two blocks from their desks may not react much to the higher price, so I doubt the cut would bring in enough new buyers. The owner and the helper gain from the lower target; price-conscious shoppers give something up. The strongest case against me is that the chain café could win those shoppers for good if the cart does not compete on price now. That is a judgment about how buyers will react, not a disagreement about the break-even figures.

Notice how it uses the case's figures, names specific groups, says who gains and who gives something up, and states a fair case for the other side without calling it wrong. That is the bar.

Participation rubric

This discussion is worth 10 points. The three criteria below look at your initial post and your peer replies.

Post early if you can — the best threads happen when people have time to reply before the second due date.

Built with The Course Maker · samples.thecoursemaker.com