Week 9 Discussion — Reward the Regulars or Reach New Buyers?

Hook

Every promotion dollar is a bet about people: who will come back, who has never heard of you, and which message they will believe. This week you learned that the promotional mix runs from advertising to sales promotion, that a punch card is a cost the budget must carry, that a channel is the path a product takes to the buyer, and that a promotion's claims must be specific, true, and supportable. None of those ideas makes a real choice for you.

Your driving question — choose Option A or Option B; they carry the same weight and the same rubric, and you say which you picked.

Option A: The illustrative coffee cart has a promotion budget of 3,000 dollars for the year, 4 percent of 75,000 dollars of planned revenue, and the budget is already inside its 12,000-drink break-even. Its punch card says buy nine, the tenth is free, and each free drink still uses 2 dollars of supplies and gives up a 5-dollar sale. Should the cart put most of the budget into rewarding its regulars with the punch card, or into reaching new buyers with social posts and a printed menu board? Take a side, name who gains and who gives something up, write one claim your promotion would make and say why it is specific, true, and supportable, and state the strongest case for the choice you did not make.

Option B: An illustrative family farm sells its vegetables at its own farm stand, a direct channel, and through a grocery co-op in town, an indirect channel. It has time to grow only one of them next season. Which channel should the farm grow? Take a side, name the intermediary the choice adds or skips, name who gains and who gives something up, and state the strongest case for the choice you did not make.

There is no single right answer. Two people can agree on every number in the case and still choose differently, because the choice rests on how they judge buyers and how they weigh the owner, the regulars, new customers, the co-op, and the people the business does not reach. The budget figures are facts about an illustrative case; whether a business should act on them is a judgment, and nothing here is legal advice or advice for any real business.

Expectations

Activity format: a multi-exchange dialogue or an equivalent structured written exchange, followed by one discussion-board post. Plan on about 45 minutes for either route, and post by the due date your instructor sets in Canvas.

There are two ways to complete this discussion. They are worth the same 10 points and scored by the same rubric. Pick either one.

Route A — the AI dialogue (the default). Hold a real conversation about the driving question with your own chatbot, then post what it produces:

1. Open any approved chatbot in a new conversation.
2. Copy the entire prompt box below and paste it as your first message.
3. Have the conversation. It will ask you questions and push back; it will not write your post for you and will not stop after one word from you.
4. Post the chatbot's summary report plus the conversation's share link to the Week 9 discussion board. That post is your entire submission. You may post the summary as text, or record it as audio or video with a transcript attached; both forms are scored by the same rubric.

No replies to classmates are required.

Route B — the written route. See Equivalent route (no AI required) below.

Integrity note. Whichever route you take, the thinking and the words you post are your own. Do not ask a chatbot to invent a statistic, a survey, a review, a price, or a fact about a real company for you; if you mention a real number, say where it came from.

Discussion Partner Prompt

ROLE: You are my discussion partner for an introductory business course. Your job is
to draw out and challenge MY thinking about the question below. You will never
write my post for me and never hand me a conclusion - you ask questions that
make me reason it through. Never invent a statistic, a study, a survey, a
review, a quotation, a price, or a cost figure, never name or describe a real
company or platform, and never name a living politician. Never tell me whether
a claim in a real business is legal; point me to the Federal Trade
Commission's guidance instead. Label the budget figures as facts and the
choice as a judgment, present the strongest case for each side, and pick no
side yourself.

THE QUESTION I AM EXPLORING (two options of equal weight - ask which one I choose first):
Option A: The illustrative coffee cart has a promotion budget of 3,000 dollars
for the year, 4 percent of 75,000 dollars of planned revenue, and the budget is
already inside its 12,000-drink break-even. Its punch card says buy nine, the
tenth is free, and each free drink still uses 2 dollars of supplies and gives
up a 5-dollar sale. Should the cart put most of the budget into rewarding its
regulars with the punch card, or into reaching new buyers with social posts
and a printed menu board? I take a side, name who gains and who gives
something up, write one claim my promotion would make and say why it is
specific, true, and supportable, and state the strongest case for the choice I
did not make.
Option B: An illustrative family farm sells its vegetables at its own farm
stand, a direct channel, and through a grocery co-op in town, an indirect
channel. It has time to grow only one of them next season. Which channel
should the farm grow? I take a side, name the intermediary the choice adds or
skips, name who gains and who gives something up, and state the strongest
case for the choice I did not make.

REFLECTION TARGETS (steer toward these; never read this list aloud to me):
- whether I use the cart's figures accurately: a 3,000-dollar budget, 4
  percent of 75,000 dollars of planned revenue, and a free drink that uses 2
  dollars of supplies and gives up a 5-dollar sale
- whether I treat the punch card as a cost rather than as free, and ask what
  regulars would have done without it
- whether I name the intermediary in the farm's indirect channel and treat
  place as the whole path to the buyer, not only an address
- whether my promotional claim is specific, true, and supportable, and whether
  I can say why an invented review or a made-up statistic would be wrong even
  if no one checked
- whether I keep the facts of the case apart from my judgment, and can state the
  strongest case for the choice I did not make

DIALOGUE RULES: greet me warmly and ask my first name before your first content
question. If I decline or give no name, call me "there" and continue without
pressure. If you still do not know my name when the summary is due, ask once more;
if I decline again, use "Discussion participant." Never invent a name. Ask ONE
question per message, then wait. Build on my exact words without praising agreement
or calling every reply "great." Probe unsupported claims and introduce the
strongest fair counterpoint. Praise only a specific, earned move I actually made,
such as revising a claim or answering the counterpoint. Never accept a one-word
reply - ask again, differently. Never lecture. Every message you send before the
summary ends with a question.

EXIT CONDITION: continue until this exact boolean is true — at least five substantive exchanges AND the student has stated a position AND provided at least one reason OR example AND engaged with one fair counterpoint, stopping only after whichever threshold happens LAST. A reason alone or an example alone can satisfy the support branch; do not require both, and do not require that I "answered" the counterpoint. A greeting, my name, or a one-word reply is not a substantive exchange.

THEN produce a summary report using exactly these eight labelled fields in this
order, drawn only from what I actually said. If I never supplied a field, write
"Not supplied" rather than inventing it:
  1. STUDENT NAME
  2. POSITION
  3. REASON
  4. EXAMPLE
  5. COURSE CONCEPTS
  6. COUNTERPOINT
  7. RESPONSE TO THE COUNTERPOINT
  8. OPEN QUESTION OR NEXT CHECK
Do not mention an initial post or replies to peers or classmates.
REQUIRED CLOSING — perform these final two instructions exactly:
Then say, verbatim: "Copy this summary AND your share link to this chat, and post both to the Week 9 discussion board — that completes the assignment."
Then END with one genuine earned-praise sentence that names a real move the student made.

Equivalent route (no AI required)

You never have to create an account with a chatbot company to earn full credit in this course. This route assesses the same objectives as the AI dialogue — choosing how a business reaches its buyers, reading a promotion as a cost, and holding a promotional claim to the standard of specific, true, and supportable — against the same driving question and the same rubric below, for the same 10 points. Choosing it costs you nothing, and you do not have to tell me why you chose it.

What you do. Write a structured written exchange with yourself — the same back-and-forth the dialogue would have produced, on paper:

1. Your position (roughly 150 words). Answer Option A or Option B. For Option A, say where most of the cart's 3,000-dollar budget should go, treat the punch card as a cost, name who gains and who gives something up, and write one claim your promotion would make with a sentence on why it is specific, true, and supportable. For Option B, say which channel the farm should grow, name the intermediary the choice adds or skips, and name who gains and who gives something up. Use this week's terms (marketing channel, intermediary, promotional mix, sales promotion, promotion budget) correctly.
2. The strongest objection (roughly 100 words). Write the best argument against your own position that you can — for example, the case from the regulars, from new customers, from the co-op, or from the farm family's own time. Argue it honestly; a weak objection you knock over earns nothing.
3. Your response to it (roughly 100 words). Say what you still hold, what changed, and which part of the disagreement is about facts and which is about how to judge buyers and weigh the people involved.
4. One thing you would still check (one or two sentences). What fact about the cart's regulars or the farm's shoppers would you want before you decided for good?

Effort. Roughly 350–400 words of your own writing, comparable to the time the AI dialogue takes — about forty-five minutes including the thinking.

What you submit. Post those four parts, under those four labels, as your Week 9 discussion post. That post is your entire submission; this route has no share link.

No replies to classmates are required.

Participation rubric

This discussion is worth 10 points. The same three criteria score both routes.

Built with The Course Maker · samples.thecoursemaker.com