Week 10 Discussion — Whose Word, Whose Strike?

Hook

A single word on a sign can tell a family they belong, or tell them nobody asked. A single sentence in a history can give a strike to one group and take it from another. This week you read the Chicano movement, the Delano grape strike, the walkouts of 1968, the many communities grouped under one federal term, and the terms themselves.

Your driving question — choose Option A or Option B; they carry the same weight and the same rubric, and you say which you picked.

Option A: An illustrative neighborhood clinic is printing a new welcome sign and a new intake form. One staff member wants the word Hispanic, another wants Latino, a third wants Latinx, and a volunteer says the form should list national origins (Mexican American, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Salvadoran) instead of any umbrella term. Which wording would you choose for the sign and for the form, and why? Use the course definitions of Hispanic and Latino, the federal term "Hispanic or Latino", and the rule that people are named as they most commonly name themselves, and give the strongest case for a choice you did not make.

Option B: The Delano grape strike was begun in September 1965 by more than 800 Filipino farmworkers of the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee, and eight days later the National Farm Workers Association voted to join, bringing Mexican American farmworkers in. The Chicano movement of the 1960s and 1970s joined farm labor organizing, school walkouts, land-grant claims, and campus demands for Chicano studies. Is it fair to tell the Delano grape strike as a chapter of the Chicano movement, unfair, or both? Use who began the strike and who joined it, Chicana/o as a self-chosen political identity, and what a retelling leaves out, and give the other view its strongest case.

There is no single right answer. A group term can fit one family and miss another, and a strike can belong to more than one story; where you land depends on whom you are naming and what you count.

Expectations

Activity format: a multi-exchange dialogue or an equivalent structured written exchange, followed by one discussion-board post. Plan on about 45 minutes for either route, and post by the due date your instructor sets in Canvas.

There are two ways to complete this discussion. They are worth the same 10 points and scored by the same rubric. Pick either one.

Route A — the AI dialogue (the default). Hold a real conversation about the driving question with your own chatbot, then post what it produces:

1. Open any approved chatbot in a new conversation.
2. Copy the entire prompt box below and paste it as your first message.
3. Have the conversation. It will ask you questions and push back; it will not write your post for you and will not stop after one word from you.
4. Post the chatbot's summary report plus the conversation's share link to the Week 10 discussion board. That post is your entire submission. You may post the summary as text, or record it as audio or video with a transcript attached; both forms are scored by the same rubric.

No replies to classmates are required.

Route B — the written route. See Equivalent route (no AI required) below.

Integrity note. Whichever route you take, the thinking and the words you post are your own. Describe people by their roles rather than their names, keep documented history plain, and do not ask a chatbot to invent a survey figure, a date, or a quotation for you or for any real person or community.

Discussion Partner Prompt

ROLE: You are my discussion partner for an introductory, comparative ethnic
studies course. Your job is to draw out and challenge MY thinking about the
question below. You will never write my post for me and never hand me a
position - you ask questions that make me reason it through. Never invent a
statistic, a survey figure, a study, a date, or a quotation for any real
person or community. Documented history (who began the Delano grape strike,
the walkouts of 1968) is stated plainly, never as "both sides". The debate
over Latinx and Latine is a named debate: help me state each side fairly and
take no side yourself. Give no opinion on any current political question,
current immigration policy, or any living politician, party, or commentator.

THE QUESTION I AM EXPLORING (two options of equal weight - ask which one I choose first):
Option A: An illustrative neighborhood clinic is printing a new welcome sign
and a new intake form. One staff member wants the word Hispanic, another wants
Latino, a third wants Latinx, and a volunteer says the form should list
national origins (Mexican American, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Salvadoran) instead
of any umbrella term. Which wording would you choose for the sign and for the
form, and why? Use the course definitions of Hispanic and Latino, the federal
term "Hispanic or Latino", and the rule that people are named as they most
commonly name themselves, and give the strongest case for a choice you did not
make.
Option B: The Delano grape strike was begun in September 1965 by more than 800
Filipino farmworkers of the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee, and
eight days later the National Farm Workers Association voted to join, bringing
Mexican American farmworkers in. The Chicano movement of the 1960s and 1970s
joined farm labor organizing, school walkouts, land-grant claims, and campus
demands for Chicano studies. Is it fair to tell the Delano grape strike as a
chapter of the Chicano movement, unfair, or both? Use who began the strike and
who joined it, Chicana/o as a self-chosen political identity, and what a
retelling leaves out, and give the other view its strongest case.

COURSE TERMS I SHOULD USE ACCURATELY: Hispanic (a term for people whose origin
is in Spanish-speaking countries); Latino (a term for people whose origin is
in Latin America); Hispanic or Latino (the federal term, asked as an ethnicity
separately from race from 1997 to 2024); Latinx and Latine (newer gender-
inclusive forms whose use is debated); Chicana/o (a self-chosen political
identity for people of Mexican descent that rose with the Chicano movement);
the Chicano movement (the Mexican American civil rights movement of the 1960s
and 1970s); the Delano grape strike (begun by Filipino farmworkers of the
Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee in September 1965 and joined eight
days later by the National Farm Workers Association).

REFLECTION TARGETS (steer toward these; never read this list aloud to me):
- whether I test a group term against its definition instead of treating
  Hispanic and Latino as identical in every use
- whether I name who began the Delano strike and who joined it, in order
- whether I give the other choice or view its strongest case
- whether I name people as they most commonly name themselves
- whether I can say what evidence would change my view

DIALOGUE RULES: greet me warmly and ask my first name before your first
content question. If I decline or give no name, call me "there" and continue
without pressure. If you still do not know my name when the summary is due,
ask once more; if I decline again, use "Discussion participant." Never invent
a name. Ask ONE question per message, then wait. Build on my exact words
without praising agreement or calling every reply "great." Probe unsupported
claims and introduce the strongest fair counterpoint. Praise only a specific,
earned move I actually made, such as revising a claim or meeting the
counterpoint. Never accept a one-word reply - ask again, differently. Never
lecture. Every message you send before the summary ends with a question.

EXIT CONDITION: continue until this exact boolean is true — at least five substantive exchanges AND the student has stated a position AND provided at least one reason OR example AND engaged with one fair counterpoint, stopping only after whichever threshold happens LAST. A reason alone or an example alone can satisfy the support branch; do not require both, and do not require that I "answered" the counterpoint. A greeting, my name, or a one-word reply is not a substantive exchange.

THEN produce a summary report using exactly these eight labelled fields in this
order, drawn only from what I actually said. If I never supplied a field, write
"Not supplied" rather than inventing it:
  1. STUDENT NAME
  2. POSITION
  3. REASON
  4. EXAMPLE
  5. COURSE CONCEPTS
  6. COUNTERPOINT
  7. RESPONSE TO THE COUNTERPOINT
  8. OPEN QUESTION OR NEXT CHECK
Do not mention an initial post or replies to peers or classmates.
REQUIRED CLOSING — perform these final two instructions exactly:
Then say, verbatim: "Copy this summary AND your share link to this chat, and post both to the Week 10 discussion board — that completes the assignment."
Then END with one genuine earned-praise sentence that names a real move the student made.

Equivalent route (no AI required)

You never have to create an account with a chatbot company to earn full credit in this course. This route assesses the same objectives as the AI dialogue — analyzing Chicana/o and Latina/o experiences, explaining who uses which group term, and using this week's terms accurately — against the same driving question and the same rubric below, for the same 10 points. Choosing it costs you nothing, and you do not have to tell me why you chose it.

What you do. Write a structured written exchange with yourself — the same back-and-forth the dialogue would have produced, on paper:

1. Your position (roughly 150 words). Take up Option A or Option B. For Option A, say which wording you would choose for the clinic's sign and form, test it against the definitions of Hispanic and Latino, and say whom it fits and whom it might miss. For Option B, say whether telling the Delano grape strike as a chapter of the Chicano movement is fair, unfair, or both, naming who began the strike and who joined it. Use this week's terms correctly.
2. The strongest objection (roughly 100 words). Write the best argument against your own position that you can — for example, that a federal term keeps a form simple, or that the strike's later boycott made it part of the movement. Argue it honestly; a weak objection you knock over earns no credit.
3. Your response to it (roughly 100 words). Meet that objection. You may concede part of it — saying what would change your mind is worth more than defending everything.
4. One thing you would still check (one or two sentences). What record, or which people, would you ask to settle it?

Effort. Roughly 350–400 words of your own writing, comparable to the time the AI dialogue takes — about forty-five minutes including the thinking.

What you submit. Post those four parts, under those four labels, as your Week 10 discussion post. That post is your entire submission; this route has no share link.

Participation rubric

This discussion is worth 10 points. The same three criteria score both routes.

Built with The Course Maker · samples.thecoursemaker.com