Week 4 Discussion — Which Liberty, Which Equality? — Traditional alternative (no AI)

Instructors: publish this instead of the adaptive version if you prefer, and unpublish or delete the adaptive one.

Hook

Every rule that asks some people to give something up for others is a small argument about liberty and equality. This week gave you the words to say which liberty, which equality, and who wins when they collide.

Your discussion question — choose Option A or Option B; they carry the same weight and the same rubric, and you say which you picked.

Option A: Pick one rule you have lived under (at school, at work, in a club, or in your town) that limits some people's liberty in order to make things more equal, or that does the reverse. Say which sense of liberty (negative or positive) and which question of equality (opportunity or outcome) is at stake. Then take a position: in that case, should liberty or equality have won, and why? State the strongest case for the other side as its own defenders would put it.

Option B: A town (an illustrative case) proposes free evening buses, paid for by a new fee on downtown parking. Take a position: should the town adopt the plan? Argue from Rawls's difference principle or from Nozick's entitlement theory, state the other thinker's strongest reply at full strength, and say which sense of liberty each side is protecting.

There is no single right answer. Thoughtful people put liberty first and thoughtful people put equality first, and Rawls and Nozick are two careful versions of that split; your job is to argue your side well and to state the other side fairly.

Expectations

Activity format: one initial post followed by two substantive peer replies. Plan on about 45 minutes across the two deadlines; your instructor sets both due dates in Canvas.

Your initial post — by the first due date (early in the module week):

• Say which option you chose.
• State your position in one clear sentence, and say which sense of liberty (negative or positive) and which question of equality (opportunity or outcome) are at stake.
• Give at least one reason, and label each premise you rely on as empirical or normative.
• State the strongest case for the other side, as its own defenders would put it, before you answer it.
• Use at least two of this week's terms (justice, negative liberty, positive liberty, equality of opportunity, equality of outcome, moral equality, negative right, positive right, common good, harm principle, paternalism, original position, veil of ignorance, difference principle, entitlement theory, minimal state) correctly, and keep Rawls's ideas and Nozick's ideas with the right thinker.
• Length: roughly 150–250 words if written. You may instead record your post as audio or video (about two minutes) and attach a transcript; both forms are scored by the same rubric.

Your replies — by the second due date (the end of the module week):

• Reply substantively to at least two classmates.
• A substantive reply does more than agree: check whether a poster named which sense of liberty is at stake, test whether a premise labelled empirical could really be checked, or state the side the poster did not take at its strongest. "Nice point!" on its own does not count.

What a strong post looks like:

I chose Option B, and I argue the town should adopt the plan. My premise that many night-shift workers have no car is empirical, and the town could check it. My premise that a missing bus should not decide who can take a night class is normative. That is a positive-liberty argument in the spirit of Rawls's difference principle. The strongest reply, from Nozick's entitlement theory, is that drivers' earnings are theirs by right, so a fee to fund a service they do not use takes from them without their consent.

Notice how it takes a side, labels each premise by kind, names the sense of liberty, and states the other side fairly before answering it. That is the bar.

Participation rubric

This discussion is worth 10 points. The three criteria below look at your initial post and your peer replies.

Post early if you can — the best threads happen when people have time to reply before the second due date.

Built with The Course Maker · samples.thecoursemaker.com