Week 10 Discussion — Do Slides Help or Hurt? — Traditional alternative (no AI)

Instructors: publish this instead of the adaptive version if you prefer, and unpublish or delete the adaptive one.

Hook

Everyone has sat through a talk where the slides did the talking, and most people have seen one picture make a hard idea click in a second. This week you learned the four functions of a presentation aid, how to match a graph to its data, the design principles, and reveal, reference, return.

Your discussion question — choose Option A or Option B; they carry the same weight and the same rubric, and you say which you picked.

Option A: Do slides make most speeches better or worse? Some people say a speaker is stronger with no slides at all, because the audience watches a person instead of a screen; others say a well-built aid is what lets listeners follow and remember a hard idea. Take a position, support it with a real class, talk, meeting, or presentation you have seen or given, and use this week's terms, such as the four functions, reading the slides, and reveal, reference, return, accurately.

Option B: Should a speaker follow the design principles strictly, or do some audiences and topics call for a denser slide? Some people say one idea per slide and the six-by-six heuristic should hold everywhere; others say a technical audience, a data-heavy topic, or a room with no handouts needs more on the screen. Take a position, support it with a real slide, class, or presentation you have seen or built, and use this week's terms, such as the design principles, working memory, and the situational lens, accurately.

There is no single right answer here. A lecture hall, a job interview, a community meeting, or a team briefing can each be argued well in more than one direction. If your example is a talk by a public figure, discuss how its aids worked on listeners, never whether you agree with the speaker. Pick a talk, class, or slide you actually remember, and tell us about it.

Expectations

Activity format: one initial post followed by two substantive peer replies. Plan on about 45 minutes across the two deadlines; your instructor sets both due dates in Canvas.

Your initial post — by the first due date (early in the module week):

• Say which option you chose.
• For Option A, describe the real class, talk, meeting, or presentation, say what its slides or other aids did for the audience, and take a position on whether slides make most speeches better or worse. For Option B, describe the real slide, class, or presentation, say how much it carried, and take a position on whether the design principles should hold strictly.
• Use at least two of this week's terms (presentation aid, the four functions, pie, line, and bar graphs, design principles, high contrast, six-by-six heuristic, working memory, reveal, reference, return, reading the slides, backup plan) correctly.
• If you mention a statistic about how much people remember from visuals, say who counted, when, and how many, or leave it out; this course keys no such number.
• Say what you would change about an aid in your own next speech, and why.
• Describe talks and situations only; never name or describe a real classmate, coworker, or family member.
• Length: roughly 150–250 words if written. You may instead record your post as audio or video (about two minutes) and attach a transcript; both forms are scored by the same rubric.

Your replies — by the second due date (the end of the module week):

• Reply substantively to at least two classmates.
• A substantive reply does more than agree: name the function a classmate's example aid served, point out where a "reference" was really reading the slides, or name a room where the poster's position would not hold. "Nice point!" on its own does not count.

What a strong post looks like (an illustrative example, attributed to no one):

I chose Option A. In a team briefing at my summer job, the manager put up one map of the warehouse, pointed to the two exits we would use during the fire drill, then took it down and talked to us. I still remember both exits. I think the slide made that talk better, because it served clarity and retention and it disappeared once its idea was done, which is reveal, reference, return. The strongest objection is that most speakers read their slides, so banning slides would help more people than it hurts. I would answer that the problem there is reading the slides, not the slide itself.

Notice how it names a real talk, ties the aid to a named function, uses the week's terms accurately, and answers an objection. That is the bar.

Participation rubric

This discussion is worth 10 points. The three criteria below look at your initial post and your peer replies.

Post early if you can — the best threads happen when people have time to reply before the second due date.

Built with The Course Maker · samples.thecoursemaker.com