Lecture: Colonial Society & the Origins of Slavery
Lecture script · about 15–20 minutes spoken · Week 3
Opening
Think of a future nurse reading a family medical history, a business student reading the fine print of a labor contract, or someone who wants to know how a rule turns into a status people can't escape. Each of them is asking the question at the center of this lecture. Who decided who was free, and how did they write it down?
In Week 1 you learned the four moves for reading any source: sourcing, contextualization, close reading, and corroboration. In Week 2 you met England's colonies, from the First Charter of Virginia to Jamestown and the Mayflower Compact. In this lecture I'll take those same colonies and ask who did their work. We'll look at servants who signed contracts with an end date. We'll look at the Africans brought to Virginia in 1619, and at the forced crossing of the Atlantic called the Middle Passage. Then we'll watch colonial law turn slavery into a status for life, passed from mother to child. We'll read one document from 1669, and we'll finish with a wave of religious revivals and a little sorting of evidence.
This is heavy material. I'll say it plainly, because the people in this history deserve plain words. Next, in Week 4, The Road to Revolution, the course turns to taxes and representation.
1. Who did the work: the colonial economies
Picture three kinds of work. A family farm where parents and children share the chores. A port shop selling goods from across the ocean. A big field of one crop that needs many hands, season after season. Each of those asks a different question. Who's going to do the work?
England's colonies grew into regions, and each one answered that question its own way. New England was settled largely by families in religious communities. The Middle Colonies were more mixed in religion and origin. In the Chesapeake, around Virginia and Maryland, planters grew tobacco, first with indentured servants and then more and more with enslaved Africans. In the Lower South, rice and later indigo were grown with the labor of enslaved Africans.
Here's the pattern I want you to notice. Where a colony's wealth came from a crop that needed many workers, the demand for bound labor was greatest. That's causation. A crop, a market, and a labor system pushed on one another.
Pause and try this. Of the four regions, which two grew their main crops with the labor of enslaved Africans?
Go back through the four regions in your head.
Here's the answer. The Chesapeake and the Lower South, because tobacco and then rice and indigo came to depend on enslaved labor.
Keep the regions apart. The colonies were never one uniform society.
2. A contract with an end date: indentured servitude
Imagine a job offer that says, "Work for us for four years, and then you're free to go." It's a hard bargain. You might take it if you had no other way to start over. But it has a last day.
That's the core of indentured servitude: labor for a fixed term of years under a contract, after which the servant was free. The term of years is the fixed length of that contract.
Let me use the chapter's illustrative contract. A servant signs at 17 for a term of 5 years. The term ends when the servant is 22. After that the servant is free. And notice what the contract doesn't do. It says nothing about the servant's children. Servitude belonged to the person who signed.
In the seventeenth-century Chesapeake, labor shifted from indentured servants, who worked for a term of years, toward enslaved Africans held for life. The planters still wanted workers. What changed was the kind of bondage they relied on.
Pause and try this. A friend says servitude and slavery were the same thing with two names. What one question would you ask to tell them apart?
Think about the servant who turned 22.
Here's the answer. Ask whether the status ends and whether it passes to children, because servitude ended after its term while slavery, by law, did not.
3. 1619, with its source
Some single lines in the record get argued about for centuries. When that happens, every word matters, and so does who wrote it down. 1619 is one of those lines, so I'm going to handle it carefully.
The National Park Service reports that in 1619 an English privateer ship brought "20 and odd" Africans to Virginia, where they were traded to the English for victuals, or food stores. A privateer was a privately owned armed ship licensed to attack enemy shipping. That phrase, "20 and odd", reaches you through the National Park Service. The course quotes it with its source and goes no further. We don't add a number, a name, or a story the record doesn't hold.
Here's a quick bit of placing. Jamestown was founded in 1607. The arrival came in 1619. That's 12 years after the colony's founding.
Now the reading in one plain sentence. The National Park Service's account shows that captive Africans were traded in Virginia in 1619. It doesn't, by itself, show what legal status those people held for the rest of their lives.
Pause and try this. Someone says racial slavery arrived in Virginia complete in 1619. Is that right, and why or why not?
Think about what the law did after that year.
Here's the answer. It's not right, because the laws that made slavery lifelong, inherited, and tied to African descent came over the following decades.
So keep the date and the system apart. 1619 marks an arrival. The law of slavery was built afterward.
4. The Atlantic slave trade and the Middle Passage
Picture a harbor where ships unload barrels, cloth, and sugar. Now picture ships that unloaded people. I want you to hold that second picture, and I want it to feel heavy, because it should.
The Atlantic slave trade was the trade that forcibly carried captive Africans across the Atlantic to be sold into slavery in the Americas. It was a trade in human beings. The Middle Passage was the forced Atlantic crossing of captive Africans to the Americas. The people on those ships were captives, taken from their homes and sold. They weren't travelers, and they weren't cargo.
Very many captives died on the crossing. Historians revise their estimates of how many. So this course says it in words, and it doesn't ask you to memorize a death figure. That isn't a way of making it smaller. It's a way of being honest about what the record can tell us.
There's one more fact that surprises a lot of people. Most enslaved Africans carried across the Atlantic went to the Caribbean and South America, not to British North America.
You've seen a piece of this before. In Week 1, the Columbian Exchange moved crops, animals, people, and diseases between the hemispheres. The Atlantic slave trade is the part of that exchange that moved people by force.
Pause and try this. Where were most enslaved Africans carried: British North America, or the Caribbean and South America?
Think about how wide the map really is.
Here's the answer. The Caribbean and South America, because British North America was one destination among several and not the largest.
5. How law made slavery hereditary and racial
Think about rules at a workplace that start small. First rule: new hires park in the far lot. Second rule: the far lot is only for certain workers. Third rule: their children will park there too. Each rule adds one step. Together they build a wall.
Colonial slavery was built that way, by law, over decades. Through the second half of the seventeenth century, colonial laws made slavery hereditary, passing through the mother, and tied it to African descent. Hereditary means passed from parent to child. In colonial slave law, it meant passed through the mother.
Put it together and you get the week's key term. Hereditary racial slavery is enslavement for life, inherited by children through the mother and tied by law to African descent. Racial slavery was built by law over decades rather than arriving complete in 1619.
Now set the two papers side by side. The servant's contract binds one person for 5 years. The law binds a person for life, and their children after them, and it draws the line by African descent. That difference is the distinction between indentured servitude and hereditary racial slavery.
One rule from Week 1 matters most here. Contextualization explains why lawmakers wrote these laws, such as the planters' demand for labor. It never excuses them. Understanding a cruel law in its time doesn't make it less cruel.
Pause and try this. Under a law that makes status follow the mother, whose status decides a child's status?
Listen again to the phrase "through the mother".
Here's the answer. The mother's, because a hereditary slave law passed the status to the child through the mother.
6. Reading the Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina
Picture the founders of a new company writing its rulebook before the first employee walks in. The rulebook shows what the owners wanted. It doesn't tell you what working there felt like.
This week's document is a rulebook for a whole colony. A frame of government is a written plan that sets out who holds power in a colony and how it is to be governed. The Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina are a colonial frame of government made by the Lords Proprietors, the men to whom the English king granted the province of Carolina. The Avalon Project keeps the text, and its heading dates it 1 March 1669. That's 50 years after 1619.
Let's do sourcing. Avalon's notes, printed with the text from Thorpe's 1909 compilation, say the form of government was framed by John Locke and amended by the Earl of Shaftesbury. They also record that a different article, on public maintenance of the Church of England, was inserted by some of the proprietors against Locke's judgment. And here's the part to hold on to. The notes don't say who drafted the slavery article. A famous name on the plan isn't proof of who wrote every line.
Now close reading. The slavery article reads, "Every freeman of Carolina shall have absolute power and authority over his negro slaves, of what opinion or religion soever." The words use the language of their time, and I quote them only so we can read the document. The words "absolute power and authority" name total control. The closing words, "of what opinion or religion soever", mean the power held whatever the enslaved person believed or practiced.
The reading in one plain sentence goes like this. The Fundamental Constitutions show that Carolina's proprietors wrote enslavers' absolute power into the colony's frame of government. They're evidence of what the proprietors planned and permitted, not of the lives or views of the people they enslaved.
Pause and try this. Do Avalon's notes say that John Locke wrote the slavery article?
Remember exactly what the notes say, and what they leave out.
Here's the answer. No, because the notes say who framed and amended the form of government, and that a different article was added against his judgment, but they don't say who drafted the slavery article.
7. The First Great Awakening
Imagine a speaker who fills a field instead of a hall. The crowd goes home arguing. Some people feel changed. Others think it all went too far. A moment like that can shake who holds authority in a town.
The First Great Awakening was a wave of religious revivals in the British colonies in the 1730s and 1740s that emphasized personal conversion and challenged established clergy. The course dates it by decade, in words. You don't need to memorize a single year for it.
Why is it in a week about colonial society? Because it shows that society changing from the inside. The revivals asked ordinary people to judge their own faith. That challenged the standing of the established ministers who had led their churches.
Pause and try this. The revivals emphasized personal conversion. Whose authority did they challenge?
Think about who led the churches before the revivals.
Here's the answer. The established clergy's, because the revivals put weight on each person's own conversion rather than on the standing ministers.
8. Sorting the evidence and ordering the years
Imagine building a picture of a colonial town from what survived. A shopkeeper's ledger tells you what was sold. A person's own memory of being enslaved tells you what no ledger would ever record. Each source answers a different question.
The course's source-sorting set is illustrative, which means it was written for this course and describes no real document. Two of its items fit this week. A merchant's account book from a Charleston shop, kept from 1774 to 1776, is primary for a question about colonial trade. An oral account recorded in the 1930s from a person born into slavery is primary for that person's own experience. You read it with the gap in time in mind. An oral account is a spoken account of a person's own experience, recorded by someone else.
Both are primary. That makes 2 primary sources this week and no secondary source. And here's the connection to the Carolina document. That frame speaks in the proprietors' voice. Accounts like the one recorded in the 1930s are where historians look for the voices of enslaved people themselves.
Last, the week's years in order: 1606, the First Charter of Virginia. 1607, Jamestown. 1619, the arrival the National Park Service reports. 1620, the Mayflower Compact. And 1669, the Carolina frame. The whole span is 63 years.
Pause and try this. How many years separate the arrival of 1619 from the Mayflower Compact?
Picture the two years side by side.
Here's the answer. One year, because the Mayflower Compact of 1620 came one year after the arrival of 1619.
So the arrival in Virginia and the Compact in New England belong to the same colonial world, a single year apart.
Closing
Let me pull it together. The colonies used labor differently, and the Chesapeake and the Lower South came to rely on enslaved Africans. Indentured servitude was labor for a term of years, with an end date. The National Park Service reports "20 and odd" Africans brought to Virginia in 1619, and racial slavery wasn't complete that year. The Middle Passage was a forced crossing in which very many captives died, and most were carried to the Caribbean and South America. Colonial law made slavery lifelong, inherited through the mother, and tied to African descent. The Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina wrote enslavers' absolute power into a frame of government. The First Great Awakening challenged established clergy. And a person's own account, even one recorded decades later, is primary for that person's experience.
Next in this module, open the slide deck and the Readings & Resources page, then work the lecture tutorial, the practice set, and the quiz, and join the discussion. In Week 4, The Road to Revolution, the colonists start arguing about taxation and representation.
Built with The Course Maker · samples.thecoursemaker.com