← Back to the Critical Thinking outline The Course Maker
← Critical Thinking outline
Week 14 · Readings & resources

Week 14 — Readings & Resources

Critical Thinking Free sample edition

Your primary reading is Chapter 14 (in this module). Everything below is the optional, go-deeper layer — pick what helps, skip the rest.

How to use this page

This page has 10 items (4 readings and 6 videos). Allow 51–62 minutes for everything. Each group points back to the matching chapter section and class-session segment, so use the full menu when you want more, or take the quick path below.

Every video here has captions: turn them on with the CC button in the player. The chapter covers the same ideas in text.

Pick-one quick path (19–23 min total)

① Look for the test that could fail

Chapter 14, Section “Catch confirmation bias in the rule-discovery task” · Session 1, Segment 1, “The rule-discovery task” · Remember: a test that could not have failed tells you very little, so aim your next test where your guess would break.

  • The Most Common Cognitive Bias — Veritasium — a five-minute video in which people on the street try the number-triple game the chapter describes, and most keep testing triples that fit their guess; watch how long it takes anyone to try a triple that could get a "no". (video, 5 min) (captions: creator)
  • Positive Bias: Look Into the Dark — LessWrong — a short essay that walks through the same number game and argues that the useful test is the one aimed where your idea predicts a "no"; read the main post and skip the comment thread. This builds on Week 13's work with testable claims and predictions that could fail. (reading, 5–7 min)

② Shortcuts that steer your estimates

Chapter 14, Section “Name the shortcuts: availability and anchoring” · Session 1, Segment 3, “Availability and anchoring” · Remember: a vivid story is not a count, and a starting number is not a fair price, so ask for the base rate and compare prices elsewhere.

③ Check the plan against the record

Chapter 14, Section “Spot motivated reasoning and overconfidence” · Session 2, Segment 4, “Motivated reasoning and overconfidence” · Remember: how sure a plan feels is not evidence, so set it beside the record of how long past projects took.

  • The Planning Fallacy: How to Tackle Time Estimates — iluli by Mike Lamb — a five-minute animation on why people expect tasks to take less time than they do, and on two habits, realism and transparency, that make an estimate more honest. (video, 5 min) (captions: creator)
  • Planning Fallacy — The Decision Lab — an explainer on why plans run long and how taking the outside view, the record of similar projects, corrects them; read from the opening through "How to avoid it" and skip the later case studies. Stop here before steelmanning and the ethical frameworks; next week takes those up. (reading, 8–12 min)

Optional one-stop reference (free online reference)

  • bias, confirmation — National Institute of Standards and Technology — a one-line glossary entry from a federal standards agency's forensic-science lexicon, defining confirmation bias as seeking and interpreting information to fit what you already expect; read the definition and its note, and skip the rest of the lexicon. (reading, 1–2 min)

Heads-up (links rot): these point to outside sites that occasionally move or rename pages. If a link ever fails, tell your instructor and use the reference above in the meantime.

Provenance: Built with The Course Maker · samples.thecoursemaker.com