Week 6 — Readings & Resources

Your primary reading is Chapter 6 (in this module). Everything below is the optional, go-deeper layer — pick what helps, skip the rest.

How to use this page

This page has 9 items (3 readings and 6 videos). Allow 63–76 minutes for everything. Each group points back to the matching chapter section and class-session segment, so use the full menu when you want more depth, or take the quick path below.

Every video here has captions: turn them on with the CC button in the player. The chapter covers the same ideas in text.

Pick-one quick path (16–21 min total)

• Chinese Room Argument, section 1: The Chinese Room Thought Experiment — Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
• Functionalism and John Searle's Chinese Room Argument - Philosophy of Mind III — Philosophy Vibe

① Three answers to what a mind is

Chapter 6, Section “Name the problem: what is a mind?” · Session 1, Segment 2, “The mind-body problem and the three standard answers” · Remember: dualism, the identity theory, and functionalism each face a hard case, and none is keyed as correct.

• Where Does Your Mind Reside?: Crash Course Philosophy #22 — CrashCourse — an episode that opens with a famous nineteenth-century brain injury that changed a man's personality, then sets out physicalism, substance dualism, and the puzzle of how a mind and a body could act on each other, before telling the story of Mary in her black-and-white room and naming qualia. It gives a physicalist reply to Mary, that the case assumes what it sets out to prove. It credits substance dualism to Descartes and describes his account of where mind and body meet; treat those claims as the episode's own, since Chapter 6 states the positions without crediting them. Its closing views on mental states that cause nothing and on the problem being unsolvable go beyond this week. (video, 9 min) (captions: creator)
• Identity Theory Explained (Philosophy of Mind) — Philosophy Vibe — a two-minute animated exchange between two speakers: one says the mind is the brain, so a pain or a feeling of love is nothing more than nerve impulses and chemistry, which escapes dualism's problem of interaction; the other objects that a brain state cannot be about something, and that it sounds strange to say love sits at one side of the skull. Compare that second objection with Dataset B's argument 2 in the chapter. The speaker who objects also brings in a principle about identity named after another philosopher, which goes beyond this week, and the clip ends on the objector's side; the course keys no verdict. (video, 2 min) (captions: automatic)

② Programs, machines, and understanding

Chapter 6, Section “Step inside the Chinese room” · Session 1, Segment 3, “Functionalism, the Turing test, and the Chinese room” · Remember: the Chinese room is about whether a program is enough for understanding, not about whether machines can answer well.

• Artificial Intelligence & Personhood: Crash Course Philosophy #23 — CrashCourse — an episode that separates weak from strong artificial intelligence, describes the Turing test as a text conversation with a hidden human and a hidden computer, and then tells Searle's Chinese room with a code book, followed by the systems reply that the whole room might know Chinese. It gives a year for Turing's proposal that the course does not use, and it says Searle thinks no computer could ever understand; Chapter 6 states the room's conclusion more narrowly, so treat that as a slip to catch. Its middle section, on a lifelike robot and on whether a soul could be given to one, goes beyond this week, and its passing remark that the argument from souls is problematic is the episode's own view, not the course's. Stop here before its closing tease about free will; next week takes that up. (video, 9 min) (captions: creator)
• Functionalism and John Searle's Chinese Room Argument - Philosophy of Mind III — Philosophy Vibe — a six-minute animated dialogue that recaps behaviorism and the identity theory, explains functionalism through the comparison of mind and brain to software and hardware, and then walks through the Chinese room with a rule book and a letter box. Its software comparison is one way of putting functionalism; the chapter's definition, mental states defined by their causal roles, is the course's. The dialogue ends by saying functionalism fails and never gives the systems reply, so add that reply from Chapter 6 and remember that the course keys no verdict. Use it while working through the Week-6 module overview. (video, 6 min) (captions: automatic)
• Chinese Room Argument, section 1: The Chinese Room Thought Experiment — Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy — a reference article; read section 1, on the thought experiment and its target, the claim that a suitably programmed computer literally understands, and then section 2a, on the systems reply and Searle's answer that a person who memorized every rule would still understand nothing. It names a particular story-understanding program from the period; you do not need its details. The later sections on further replies and on Searle's axioms go beyond this week. This builds on Week 2's work with standard form and validity: try writing section 1's argument as numbered premises and a conclusion. (reading, 10–15 min)

③ What experience is like from the inside

Chapter 6, Section “Meet Mary in her black-and-white room” · Session 2, Segment 4, “Nagel's bat, Jackson's Mary, and the three positions side by side” · Remember: the bat and Mary ask whether a physical account leaves out what experience is like, and each has a physicalist reply.

• What Is It Like To Be a Bat? Thomas Nagel explained! Quixotic Questions — Quixotic Questions — an eight-minute narrated explainer that starts with how science explains water and lightning by their physical parts, then follows Nagel's argument that the subjective character of experience is left over: imagining yourself hanging upside down and clicking does not tell you what echoes are like for a bat. It ends with Nagel's comparison to a caterpillar locked in a safe that comes out a butterfly, to say that physicalism may be true while we lack the concepts to understand how. It quotes lines from Nagel's paper that the course has not checked, so treat them as unverified and use Chapter 6's statement of the argument. (video, 8 min) (captions: automatic)
• What are Qualia? (Philosophical Definitions) — Carneades.org — a three-minute definition of qualia as the felt qualities of experience, such as seeing red or being thirsty, with the point that they are subjective and the open question of whether a color-sorting computer could have them. It mentions Mary's room in passing and names the singular, quale. Its mention of creatures that act like us but feel nothing goes beyond this week. (video, 3 min) (captions: automatic)
• Knowledge argument, section: Thought experiment — Wikipedia — read the thought-experiment section, which sets out Mary's case and the question of whether she learns something new, and then the section on the ability hypothesis, the reply that Mary gains new abilities rather than a new fact. The block quotation of Jackson's own wording is not one the course pins, so describe the case in your own words. The later sections on other replies and on how Jackson's own view changed go beyond this week. (reading, 8–12 min)

Optional one-stop reference (free online reference)

• Functionalism, section 1: What is Functionalism? — online Encyclopedia of Philosophy (reference entry) — read section 1, which defines a mental state by the role it plays, uses pain as its example, and explains why creatures built very differently from us could still be in pain; skip the later sections on varieties of functionalism and its objections. (reading, 8–12 min)

Heads-up (links rot): these point to outside sites that occasionally move or rename pages. If a link ever fails, tell your instructor and use the reference above in the meantime.

Provenance: Built with The Course Maker · samples.thecoursemaker.com