Week 15 Discussion — What Is It All For? — Traditional alternative (no AI)

Instructors: publish this instead of the adaptive version if you prefer, and unpublish or delete the adaptive one.

Hook

A coworker leaves a steady job after decades to train as a carpenter, and someone at the farewell lunch asks, "What is it all for?" Sisyphus pushes his rock up the hill, it rolls back down, and Camus asks us to imagine him happy. In both cases the question is the same: can a life be meaningful when no one hands it a purpose?

Your discussion question — choose Option A or Option B; they carry the same weight and the same rubric, and you say which you picked.

Option A: Can Sisyphus's life, as Camus imagines it, be meaningful? Take a position using one of the course's 3 answers to the question of life's meaning (given from outside, created by the individual, or found in valuable activities and relationships), state the brave-face objection at its strongest, and say whether it moves you.

Option B: Think of a task or commitment you care about that never quite finishes, such as a craft, a team, a garden, or the volunteer's river trail. Where does its meaning come from: from outside, from your own choice, or from its being worth caring about? Take a position, use Sartre's claim that existence precedes essence or Beauvoir's point about freedom in a situation, and say what would change your mind.

There is no single right answer. Careful thinkers still disagree about whether a life can be meaningful without a purpose given from outside, and about whether Sisyphus has found meaning or put on a brave face. Pick the option you actually care about, and tell us your reasoning.

Expectations

Activity format: one initial post followed by two substantive peer replies. Plan on about 45 minutes across the two deadlines; your instructor sets both due dates in Canvas.

Your initial post — by the first due date (early in the module week):

• Say which option you chose.
• For Option A, say whether Sisyphus's life, as Camus imagines it, can be meaningful, tie your view to one of the 3 answers to the question of life's meaning, and state the brave-face objection at its strongest; for Option B, name the task or commitment, say where its meaning comes from, and use existence precedes essence or Beauvoir's point about freedom in a situation.
• Use at least two of this week's terms (essence, existence precedes essence, the absurd, situation, meaning given from outside, meaning created by the individual, meaning found in valuable activities and relationships) correctly.
• State the view you reject in its strongest form, give your reason, and say what would change your mind.
• Length: roughly 150–250 words if written. You may instead record your post as audio or video (about two minutes) and attach a transcript; both forms are scored by the same rubric.
• Keep any example you give away from hot-button topics and real current controversies, and never name a real person in a case.

Your replies — by the second due date (the end of the module week):

• Reply substantively to at least two classmates.
• A substantive reply does more than agree: state the strongest version of the poster's view in your own words, ask whether their case really fits the answer or thinker they tie it to, or offer a variation, labelled as one, that pulls the other way. "Nice point!" on its own does not count.

What a strong post looks like:

I chose Option A. I think Sisyphus's life can be meaningful, and I read it through meaning created by the individual. Camus' Sisyphus knows the rock will roll back, and he walks down for it anyway; owning the task is a choice he keeps making. The strongest objection is the brave-face objection: nothing about the task changes, so his happiness may only be making the best of a bad situation. I grant that the rock achieves nothing. But the objection assumes meaning must come from what a task achieves, and that is the very question at issue. What would change my mind is a case where someone chose a task that harmed others; then choosing alone would not seem enough.

Notice how it takes a position, states the other side at its strongest, ties the reason to meaning created by the individual, one of the course's 3 answers to the question of life's meaning, and says what would change the writer's mind. That is the bar.

Participation rubric

This discussion is worth 10 points. The three criteria below look at your initial post and your peer replies.

Post early if you can — the best threads happen when people have time to reply before the second due date.

Built with The Course Maker · samples.thecoursemaker.com