Week 1 Discussion — Argument, Explanation, or Both? — Traditional alternative (no AI)

Instructors: publish this instead of the adaptive version if you prefer, and unpublish or delete the adaptive one.

Hook

The same word, "because," can try to convince you of something or can tell you why something you already accept is so. This week you learned the doubt test for telling the two apart, and real messages often sit right on the line between them.

Your discussion question — choose Option A or Option B; they carry the same weight and the same rubric, and you say which you picked.

Option A: A gym sends this email to members (illustrative): "Our pool will be closed next month because the heating system is being replaced. Members who swim every day should plan to use the city pool instead." Is the email an argument, an explanation, or both? Find any conclusion and the reasons offered for it, run the doubt test, and say whether your verdict would change for a member who already knew about the closing.

Option B: Choose a short message from your own life that gives a reason for something: a group-chat post, a workplace email, a product ad, or a sign (no politicians, parties, or campaigns, and no one's real name). Is it an argument, an explanation, a report, or an unsupported assertion? Find its parts, defend your label with this week's tests, and say which audience could read it differently.

There is no single right answer here. Many real messages mix an argument with an explanation, and the audience can change which job a sentence is doing. Pick the option you actually care about, and make your case.

Expectations

Activity format: one initial post followed by two substantive peer replies. Plan on about 45 minutes across the two deadlines; your instructor sets both due dates in Canvas.

Your initial post — by the first due date (early in the module week):

• Say which option you chose.
• Quote the message, name its conclusion and the reasons offered for it, and say whether it argues, explains, or does both.
• Run the doubt test out loud: say who the audience is and whether the supported claim is in doubt for them.
• Use at least two of this week's terms (claim, premise, conclusion, argument, explanation, report, premise indicator, conclusion indicator) correctly.
• Say which audience could read the message differently, and why.
• Length: roughly 150–250 words if written. You may instead record your post as audio or video (about two minutes) and attach a transcript; both forms are scored by the same rubric.
• Write from your own reasoning, in your own words, and keep real people's names and live political questions out of your examples.

Your replies — by the second due date (the end of the module week):

• Reply substantively to at least two classmates.
• A substantive reply does more than agree: name an audience who would hear the classmate's message differently, find a premise or conclusion the post missed, or note a "because" that explains rather than argues. "Nice post!" on its own does not count.

What a strong post looks like:

I chose Option A, and I think the gym email does both jobs. The first sentence explains: for members who already know the pool is closing, "because the heating system is being replaced" tells them why. The second sentence argues: its conclusion is that daily swimmers should plan to use the city pool, and the closing is the reason offered. A member who had not heard about the closing might read the first sentence as news rather than an explanation, so the audience matters. I would want to know whether the gym had announced the closing before.

Notice how it finds the conclusion, names the reason, runs the doubt test with a named audience, and says what would settle the label. That is the bar.

Participation rubric

This discussion is worth 10 points. The three criteria below look at your initial post and your peer replies.

Post early if you can — the best threads happen when people have time to reply before the second due date.

Built with The Course Maker · samples.thecoursemaker.com